Timeline for Can Mathematica provide a reliable estimate of the numerical error from NDSolve?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2019 at 16:11 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 11, 2019 at 16:11 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 29, 2019 at 16:21 | comment | added | Michael E2 |
@user21 Thank you very much. Kind of too bad about the LSODA restriction, since, being the usual Automatic method, it is the method one would most often want to monitor.
|
|
| Nov 29, 2019 at 15:56 | comment | added | user21 | I filed it. We will see.... | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 15:53 | comment | added | user21 | It absolutely should be documented or the restrictions removed, unfortunately sw spreads us out too thinly over the bread to keep on top of all these... I'll file it as a bug/suggestion but don't hold your breath! Sorry about that. | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 15:49 | comment | added | Michael E2 |
@user21 Thanks. Of course, I've rooted around NDSolve more than the average user. I noticed that MonitorMethod does not work with the submethods LSODA and Adams (maybe others?). Aside from wondering why, I thought it would be nice if the restrictions were documented.
|
|
| Nov 29, 2019 at 15:46 | comment | added | user21 | (+1), funny just a few days we internally talked about this and that it's not well known and now it pops up. Great answer. | |
| Nov 29, 2019 at 15:42 | history | answered | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |