Timeline for Upper and lower bounds or points that do not align
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2019 at 13:12 | vote | accept | tst | ||
| Sep 26, 2019 at 23:25 | answer | added | JimB | timeline score: 3 | |
| Sep 26, 2019 at 21:58 | comment | added | JimB | I think there is a lack of definition of what the upper and lower bounds are when the curves are not known. For example, why should there be that large change in slope of the upper bound around (-0.4, 0.9). Why shouldn't it be smoother in that area? I think you'd need to come up with an operational definition for which points should be on the borders and then how much smoothing should be applied (which will be somewhat arbitrary - meaning others might use different rules) and see if that matches what you think it should look like. | |
| Sep 26, 2019 at 18:36 | comment | added | tst | @march you were right. I mispasted code. I fixed it now. Thanks | |
| Sep 26, 2019 at 18:36 | history | edited | tst | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 149 characters in body
|
| Sep 26, 2019 at 17:44 | comment | added | Alan | See this question | |
| Sep 26, 2019 at 17:40 | comment | added | march |
There are a couple of errors in your code, I think. First of all, the 2nd-to-last line is floating by itself and should either be deleted or attached to whatever missing code is there. Next, your points has some entries that depend on the symbol r1, which isn't defined.
|
|
| Sep 26, 2019 at 17:30 | history | asked | tst | CC BY-SA 4.0 |