Timeline for Matrix definition using some rules for the elements
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 14, 2019 at 23:50 | vote | accept | AYBRXQD | ||
May 13, 2019 at 16:44 | history | edited | AYBRXQD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
May 13, 2019 at 15:49 | comment | added | Roman | Your second definition still doesn't make sense. There is no $n$ on the left-hand side; so why is there one on the right? | |
May 13, 2019 at 15:35 | history | edited | AYBRXQD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
May 13, 2019 at 12:27 | answer | added | Roman | timeline score: 2 | |
May 13, 2019 at 12:21 | comment | added | bill s | Try KroneckerDelta: for instance the first matrix could be: Range[4]^2 Array[KroneckerDelta, {4, 6}] | |
May 13, 2019 at 12:20 | comment | added | Roman | Did you mean $\langle n\lvert M \rvert m \rangle = m^2 \delta_{m,n}+(1-m)(\delta_{m,n+2}+\delta_{m,n-2})$? As @JohnDoty says, your definitions as they are do not make sense. Also, please add the required ranges of the indices $n$ and $m$. | |
May 13, 2019 at 11:55 | comment | added | John Doty | You have two different definitions. Do you mean that the matrix you seek is the sum of the ones you've defined? | |
May 13, 2019 at 11:34 | history | asked | AYBRXQD | CC BY-SA 4.0 |