Timeline for How to implement a resumable Table?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 10, 2019 at 3:52 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 197 characters in body
|
May 10, 2019 at 3:40 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 165 characters in body
|
May 10, 2019 at 3:21 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2219 characters in body; edited title; edited tags
|
May 10, 2019 at 3:10 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 2219 characters in body; edited title
|
May 10, 2019 at 2:19 | comment | added | M.R. | That would be a great thing, but it's tricky to get right with periodically saving the sub-results in each slave kernel and then reassembling the correct results after a crash when resuming and merging the finished results back together - and even trickier might I say to monitor (which one can't do with a norml ParallelTable)! | |
May 9, 2019 at 22:05 | comment | added | Ray Shadow |
If your calculation is long, do you use ParallelMap ?
|
|
May 9, 2019 at 21:56 | comment | added | M.R. | Could you improve my answer with smart MX checkpointing? | |
May 9, 2019 at 21:54 | comment | added | M.R. | Thanks that's good to know | |
May 9, 2019 at 21:53 | comment | added | b3m2a1 | @M.R. Actually MX has recently become cross-platform compatible. Backwards compatible is less so though I think. | |
May 9, 2019 at 21:52 | comment | added | M.R. | @b3m2a1 I'd love to see a parallel list chunker, and export to mx is fast but not portable.. | |
May 9, 2019 at 21:41 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1660 characters in body
|
May 9, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/1126592836441378816 | ||
May 9, 2019 at 20:42 | answer | added | Roman | timeline score: 6 | |
May 9, 2019 at 19:51 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 251 characters in body; edited title
|
May 9, 2019 at 19:00 | comment | added | b3m2a1 |
I’d just stick to Export to MX. More primitive but more reliable. I do this when I’m working with like 10GB in memory. You might need more but if you chunk it up it’s lol be fine.
|
|
May 9, 2019 at 18:44 | comment | added | Roman | Possible duplicate: mathematica.stackexchange.com/q/193301/26598 | |
May 9, 2019 at 18:33 | history | asked | M.R. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |