Timeline for Is the sharing of variables in Module/Block within Compile documented behavior?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2020 at 12:28 | history | edited | Mr.Wizard |
edited tags
|
|
| Feb 21, 2013 at 13:52 | vote | accept | Mr.Wizard | ||
| Feb 18, 2013 at 18:06 | comment | added | m_goldberg | @OleksandrR. It may be a platitude, but its WRI's official platitude. :) | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 11:58 | comment | added | Oleksandr R. | @m_goldberg given that the VM and the top-level interpreter have very little in common, that statement can be viewed something of a platitude... most of the VM behavior surely has to be considered as undocumented, and for the documentation simply to state that there are differences is hardly any help. | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 8:35 | answer | added | Leonid Shifrin | timeline score: 18 | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 7:20 | history | edited | Mr.Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 18, 2013 at 7:19 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackMma/status/303403318137475072 | ||
| Feb 18, 2013 at 7:10 | comment | added | m_goldberg | Well, the Mathematica documentation does say "Compiled code does not handle numerical precision and local variables in the same way as ordinary Mathematica code. ". Module and Block still behave as you have observed in V9.0.1, so I guess it has some stability. | |
| Feb 18, 2013 at 6:43 | history | asked | Mr.Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |