Timeline for Why does Arg'[1. + I] return -0.5?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 25, 2019 at 12:48 | history | edited | Roman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 238 characters in body
|
Apr 25, 2019 at 9:00 | history | edited | Roman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 382 characters in body
|
Apr 25, 2019 at 8:50 | comment | added | Roman |
@Nasser they do give the same result when you apply N : Arg'[1 + I] // N also gives -0.5 .
|
|
Apr 25, 2019 at 8:48 | comment | added | Roman | @xzczd $z$ and $z^*$ are independent variables in complex analysis, so $\partial z^*/\partial z=0$ etc. | |
Apr 25, 2019 at 8:47 | comment | added | Nasser |
Any idea why then With[{z = 1.0 + I}, Arg'[z]] not same as With[{z = 1 + I}, Arg'[z]] ? Should not these give same result?
|
|
Apr 25, 2019 at 8:45 | comment | added | xzczd♦ | Er… how is derivative of $\ln(z^*)$ defined here? | |
Apr 25, 2019 at 8:36 | history | edited | Roman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
Apr 25, 2019 at 8:34 | history | edited | xzczd♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minimal revision.
|
Apr 25, 2019 at 8:23 | history | answered | Roman | CC BY-SA 4.0 |