Timeline for Sum over integer partition with variable function argument
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2018 at 2:45 | answer | added | Jagerber48 | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 21, 2018 at 7:30 | vote | accept | Jagerber48 | ||
| Dec 21, 2018 at 1:11 | history | edited | Jagerber48 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 27 characters in body
|
| Dec 21, 2018 at 1:09 | comment | added | Jagerber48 | Yes that is correct. That is a more explicit expression. I'll update the question to reflect this. | |
| Dec 21, 2018 at 1:01 | comment | added | march | I'm confused about your sum. Is this a set of nested commutators? So really, you have something like $\hat{S}_{n_1} (\hat{S}_{n_2} ( \dots \hat{S}_{n_k} (V) \dots ) )$? | |
| Dec 21, 2018 at 0:56 | answer | added | march | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 21, 2018 at 0:47 | history | asked | Jagerber48 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |