Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 7, 2018 at 1:18 vote accept AG1123
Dec 6, 2018 at 9:16 comment added AG1123 I see. That was my suspicion too. Anyway, thanks a lot for the help! I definitely got something from your answer, so if there are no answers that completely solve my problem soon, I will accept yours.
Dec 6, 2018 at 8:46 history edited eyorble CC BY-SA 4.0
added 272 characters in body
Dec 6, 2018 at 8:44 comment added eyorble FindMaximum is a local solver, so it's not sufficient proof that there are no solutions. NMaximize is a global solver, but it is numerical in nature, so it's not airtight proof that there is no solution. Maximize is a global symbolic solver, but probably won't be any faster than Solve or Reduce here. This approach isn't easily modifiable to prove the non-existence of a solution, sorry. This won't make Solve or Reduce any faster here either. With the unedited question it was easy to show that there was at least one solution, but your problem's a lot harder now.
Dec 6, 2018 at 8:19 comment added AG1123 Assuming this is the case, how can I modify your code so that I can try to get an exact answer (e.g. using Reduce or Solve) to whether this inequality can ever be fulfilled?
Dec 6, 2018 at 7:43 comment added AG1123 First of all, thanks for the answer! Then, apologies but I found some mistakes on the posted code: I had extra squares on the RankedMax's. After fixing this and running your code again, I get the following answer: {-1.28856*10^-15, {t1 -> 0.0000500457, l1 -> -0.000292867, t2 -> 0.0000500457, l2 -> -0.000292867, t3 -> 0.0000500492, l3 -> -0.000292906}} Does this, in your opinion, demonstrate that maybe no solutions exist?
Dec 6, 2018 at 6:58 history answered eyorble CC BY-SA 4.0