Timeline for Transformation rule for a sum of functions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 4, 2018 at 1:42 | comment | added | JimB | OK. Got it. Sorry about about my wrong inference.. | |
Dec 3, 2018 at 23:04 | vote | accept | Max | ||
Dec 3, 2018 at 22:47 | comment | added | Max |
I want to end-up with exp[c[x]]+exp[d[x]]+exp[e[x]] . exp was supposed to mean "expected value" for some random distribution. Initially I used \[DoubleStruckE] for that function, but converted it to lower-case exp to post my question here.
|
|
Dec 3, 2018 at 4:44 | answer | added | Robert Jacobson | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 3, 2018 at 1:54 | answer | added | NonDairyNeutrino | timeline score: 0 | |
Dec 3, 2018 at 1:45 | comment | added | JimB |
I have to ask: Do you want to end up with Exp[c[x]]+Exp[d[x]+Exp[e[x]] or Exp[c[x]]*Exp[d[x]*Exp[e[x]] ? If by exp you really mean Exp , then the former is not the proper expansion while the latter is.
|
|
Dec 3, 2018 at 1:43 | answer | added | bbgodfrey | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 3, 2018 at 1:37 | history | edited | NonDairyNeutrino | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Reformatted code and edited tags
|
Dec 3, 2018 at 1:26 | history | asked | Max | CC BY-SA 4.0 |