Timeline for Create a slider for a constant used in a function
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 23, 2018 at 12:54 | vote | accept | Simon Iversen | ||
Aug 23, 2018 at 12:15 | answer | added | Alexei Boulbitch | timeline score: 1 | |
Aug 23, 2018 at 11:05 | comment | added | Simon Iversen | @AlexeiBoulbitch, perfect! That solved it! Can you add your comment as an answer so I can mark it as solved? Thanks! | |
Aug 23, 2018 at 11:01 | comment | added | Alexei Boulbitch |
Try to add the option PlotPoints -> 50 to your plot statement. It may improve the quality of the plot. Play with the number of points.
|
|
Aug 23, 2018 at 10:03 | comment | added | Simon Iversen | @kglr, thank you, but unfortunately the exact same behavior. | |
Aug 23, 2018 at 10:01 | comment | added | kglr |
you can try using the option PerformanceGoal -> "Quality" in ContourPlot (the responsiveness tp slider movements will be slower)
|
|
Aug 23, 2018 at 10:01 | comment | added | Simon Iversen | @HenrikSchumacher, it doesn't change after releasing the mouse button. I'm using version 11.1.1 on Linux. Do you by any chance have an idea what the issue could be? Regardless, thanks for your help! | |
Aug 23, 2018 at 9:54 | comment | added | Henrik Schumacher | This seems to work as is should in my copy of version 11.3 for macOS. The first picture looks like what I get when I move the slider and do not release it. Per default, Mathematica tries to increase responsiveness by computing in low quality during dynamic changes. But I don't know what went wrong in your case. Usually, releasing the mouse button leads to a high-definition render after a second or so. | |
Aug 23, 2018 at 9:48 | history | asked | Simon Iversen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |