Timeline for Multi-peak fitting for peak position
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2018 at 6:37 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/1015847319516975104 | ||
| Jun 29, 2018 at 14:33 | comment | added | Daniel Lichtblau | @Antonx3 Done.. | |
| Jun 29, 2018 at 14:32 | answer | added | Daniel Lichtblau | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jun 29, 2018 at 13:22 | comment | added | Anton Antonov | @DanielLichtblau Please consider posting an answer with the solution you outlined. (I think it would be very useful...) | |
| Jun 28, 2018 at 23:11 | comment | added | Daniel Lichtblau |
What about using a few sinusoids? If I take Fourier and zero all but the largest components, the result of InverseFourier is still a fairly good approximation.
|
|
| Jun 28, 2018 at 0:56 | answer | added | Anton Antonov | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jun 25, 2018 at 13:50 | history | edited | Anton Antonov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 62 characters in body
|
| Jun 25, 2018 at 13:05 | answer | added | Anton Antonov | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 25, 2018 at 10:24 | comment | added | Anton Antonov | Please clarify this: "[...] track their position as the second variable y changes." I assume you want to find for correspondence between values of y and peak locations. | |
| Jun 25, 2018 at 7:29 | comment | added | sole | Sorry, that's a function that I used to get data1 and data2. I replaced it. | |
| Jun 25, 2018 at 7:29 | history | edited | sole | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
removed undefined function
|
| Jun 25, 2018 at 2:10 | comment | added | Anton Antonov |
The function cutSlowAxis is not defined in the question.
|
|
| Jun 25, 2018 at 2:08 | history | rollback | Anton Antonov |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Jun 25, 2018 at 2:06 | history | edited | Anton Antonov | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 49 characters in body
|
| Jun 24, 2018 at 23:29 | history | asked | sole | CC BY-SA 4.0 |