Timeline for Bug: Wrong limit in Mathematica 11.1.1 and current WolframAlpha
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
31 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2021 at 21:18 | comment | added | fgrieu | BTFI = Been There Found It | |
| Jan 19, 2021 at 13:57 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 11, 2018 at 6:15 | vote | accept | fgrieu | ||
| Jun 10, 2018 at 23:39 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/1005957729901563904 | ||
| Jun 10, 2018 at 23:08 | comment | added | halirutan | We decided to keep this Q&A for reference and I created a CW answer. | |
| Jun 10, 2018 at 23:07 | history | edited | halirutan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 61 characters in body
|
| Jun 10, 2018 at 23:03 | answer | added | halirutan | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jun 10, 2018 at 22:56 | history | reopened | halirutan | ||
| Jun 10, 2018 at 17:28 | comment | added | halirutan | @DanielLichtblau Yes, I agree. My only concern was that a closed question might be deleted at some point and another user with an older M version asks a very similar question. That's my only reason for keeping this post as a reference. | |
| Jun 10, 2018 at 15:40 | comment | added | Daniel Lichtblau | @Halirutan (and Francois) I think it is simply a BTGF (bug that got fixed) or maybe a BTFI (I'll let you guess). Okay with me if a bug header is added. I had no issue with the question, and I voted to close mostly because there is really no good response since it appears to be working in the current version. | |
| Jun 10, 2018 at 11:22 | history | closed |
Daniel Lichtblau José Antonio Díaz Navas MarcoB m_goldberg Mariusz Iwaniuk |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Jun 10, 2018 at 10:48 | history | edited | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Polish
|
| Jun 10, 2018 at 10:42 | history | edited | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
The second limit is OK
|
| Jun 10, 2018 at 5:58 | history | edited | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Polish
|
| Jun 10, 2018 at 1:23 | comment | added | halirutan | What are we going to do with this? Do we really want to close it or is someone going to report it to WRI, we add a bug-header and keep this as a reference for future visitors? | |
| Jun 9, 2018 at 18:01 | history | edited | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Trim the second WolframAlpha case
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 17:55 | history | edited | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Update version info
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 16:04 | comment | added | Vaclav Kotesovec |
MMA 11.0.0.0 returns 1/360
|
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 15:52 | history | edited | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Versions in title
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 15:06 | comment | added | JimB |
MMA 10.4.1 returns 1/360 and 139/51840 with Log[x!] and Log[Gamma[x+1]] and LogGamma[x+1].
|
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 14:48 | history | edited | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Polish
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 13:49 | history | edited | Szabolcs |
edited tags
|
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 12:51 | comment | added | user45937 |
@fgrieu MMA 11.3 returns 1/360 and 139/51840 with x! in both cases.
|
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 12:42 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jun 10, 2018 at 1:24 | |||||
| Jun 9, 2018 at 12:40 | history | edited | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Workarounds
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 12:27 | history | edited | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add a nicer reference
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 12:22 | comment | added | Mariusz Iwaniuk |
I checked WolframAlfa and again give me 1/360.Paste this code to Wolfram Alfa: limit ((x + 1/2)*Ln(x) - x + Ln(2 Pi)/2 - Ln(Gamma(x+1)) + 1/(12 x)) *x^3 x approach to Infinity
|
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 12:18 | comment | added | Michael E2 |
Also, the second limit is 139/51840, which is correct.
|
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 12:12 | history | edited | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Shorter title, other reference
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 12:12 | comment | added | Mariusz Iwaniuk |
MMA 11.3 give a correct answer 1/360
|
|
| Jun 9, 2018 at 11:56 | history | asked | fgrieu | CC BY-SA 4.0 |