Skip to main content
added 8 characters in body
Source Link
$Assumptions = Element[t, Reals] && Element[ω, Reals] && ω > 0 
&& t > 0;
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 ω^2) (1.2214 + E^ω Cos[
2 ArcTan[t ω]]), -1.70919*10^8 E^ω t ω] + 
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 ω^2) (1.2214 + E^ω 
Cos[2ArcTan[t ω]]),1.70919*10^8 E^ω t ω]//FullSimplify

Mathematica doesn't simplify this seemingly ArcTan[x,y]+ArcTan[x,-y]ArcTan[x,y]+ArcTan[x,-y] expression. I plotted the 3D-graph, it shows the expression is zero for all values of tt and $\omega$\[Omega].

I understand one underlying reason might be Mathematica isn't sure about the positivity of CosCos term in "x"x, and hence, "x"x. Am I right? Any ideas to simplify this term in code, instead of manually, would be very much appreciated. I'm relatively new to the language.

$Assumptions = Element[t, Reals] && Element[ω, Reals] && ω > 0 
&& t > 0;
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 ω^2) (1.2214 + E^ω Cos[
2 ArcTan[t ω]]), -1.70919*10^8 E^ω t ω] + 
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 ω^2) (1.2214 + E^ω 
Cos[2ArcTan[t ω]]),1.70919*10^8 E^ω t ω]//FullSimplify

Mathematica doesn't simplify this seemingly ArcTan[x,y]+ArcTan[x,-y] expression. I plotted the 3D-graph, it shows the expression is zero for all values of t and $\omega$.

I understand one underlying reason might be Mathematica isn't sure about the positivity of Cos term in "x", and hence, "x". Am I right? Any ideas to simplify this term in code, instead of manually, would be very much appreciated. I'm relatively new to the language.

$Assumptions = Element[t, Reals] && Element[ω, Reals] && ω > 0 
&& t > 0;
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 ω^2) (1.2214 + E^ω Cos[
2 ArcTan[t ω]]), -1.70919*10^8 E^ω t ω] + 
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 ω^2) (1.2214 + E^ω 
Cos[2ArcTan[t ω]]),1.70919*10^8 E^ω t ω]//FullSimplify

Mathematica doesn't simplify this seemingly ArcTan[x,y]+ArcTan[x,-y] expression. I plotted the 3D-graph, it shows the expression is zero for all values of t and \[Omega].

I understand one underlying reason might be Mathematica isn't sure about the positivity of Cos term in x, and hence, x. Am I right? Any ideas to simplify this term in code, instead of manually, would be very much appreciated. I'm relatively new to the language.

deleted 84 characters in body
Source Link
Henrik Schumacher
  • 109.5k
  • 7
  • 186
  • 322
$Assumptions = Element[t, Reals] && Element[\[Omega]Element[ω, Reals] && \[Omega]ω > 0 
&& t > 0;
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 \[Omega]^2ω^2) (1.2214 + E^\[Omega]E^ω Cos[
2 ArcTan[t \[Omega]]]ω]]), -1.70919*10^8 E^\[Omega]E^ω t \[Omega]]ω] + 
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 \[Omega]^2ω^2) (1.2214 + E^\[Omega]E^ω 
Cos[2ArcTan[t \[Omega]]]ω]]),1.70919*10^8 E^\[Omega]E^ω t \[Omega]]ω]//FullSimplify

Mathematica doesn't simplify this seemingly ArcTan[x,y]+ArcTan[x,-y] expression. I plotted the 3D-graph, it shows the expression is zero for all values of t and $\omega$.

I understand one underlying reason might be Mathematica isn't sure about the positivity of Cos term in "x", and hence, "x". Am I right? Any ideas to simplify this term in code, instead of manually, would be very much appreciated. I'm relatively new to the language.

$Assumptions = Element[t, Reals] && Element[\[Omega], Reals] && \[Omega] > 0 
&& t > 0;
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 \[Omega]^2) (1.2214 + E^\[Omega] Cos[
2 ArcTan[t \[Omega]]]), -1.70919*10^8 E^\[Omega] t \[Omega]] + 
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 \[Omega]^2) (1.2214 + E^\[Omega] 
Cos[2ArcTan[t \[Omega]]]),1.70919*10^8 E^\[Omega] t \[Omega]]//FullSimplify

Mathematica doesn't simplify this seemingly ArcTan[x,y]+ArcTan[x,-y] expression. I plotted the 3D-graph, it shows the expression is zero for all values of t and $\omega$.

I understand one underlying reason might be Mathematica isn't sure about the positivity of Cos term in "x", and hence, "x". Am I right? Any ideas to simplify this term in code, instead of manually, would be very much appreciated. I'm relatively new to the language.

$Assumptions = Element[t, Reals] && Element[ω, Reals] && ω > 0 
&& t > 0;
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 ω^2) (1.2214 + E^ω Cos[
2 ArcTan[t ω]]), -1.70919*10^8 E^ω t ω] + 
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 ω^2) (1.2214 + E^ω 
Cos[2ArcTan[t ω]]),1.70919*10^8 E^ω t ω]//FullSimplify

Mathematica doesn't simplify this seemingly ArcTan[x,y]+ArcTan[x,-y] expression. I plotted the 3D-graph, it shows the expression is zero for all values of t and $\omega$.

I understand one underlying reason might be Mathematica isn't sure about the positivity of Cos term in "x", and hence, "x". Am I right? Any ideas to simplify this term in code, instead of manually, would be very much appreciated. I'm relatively new to the language.

Source Link

Simplifying this ArcTan sum expression

$Assumptions = Element[t, Reals] && Element[\[Omega], Reals] && \[Omega] > 0 
&& t > 0;
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 \[Omega]^2) (1.2214 + E^\[Omega] Cos[
2 ArcTan[t \[Omega]]]), -1.70919*10^8 E^\[Omega] t \[Omega]] + 
ArcTan[8.54596*10^7 (1. + 1. t^2 \[Omega]^2) (1.2214 + E^\[Omega] 
Cos[2ArcTan[t \[Omega]]]),1.70919*10^8 E^\[Omega] t \[Omega]]//FullSimplify

Mathematica doesn't simplify this seemingly ArcTan[x,y]+ArcTan[x,-y] expression. I plotted the 3D-graph, it shows the expression is zero for all values of t and $\omega$.

I understand one underlying reason might be Mathematica isn't sure about the positivity of Cos term in "x", and hence, "x". Am I right? Any ideas to simplify this term in code, instead of manually, would be very much appreciated. I'm relatively new to the language.