Timeline for Function with EllipticK does not evaluate in certain range
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2018 at 15:46 | comment | added | user129412 | That's fantastic. Thank you. | |
| Sep 24, 2018 at 14:13 | comment | added | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | Apologies for the much delayed response; please have a look now. | |
| Sep 24, 2018 at 14:13 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added AGM solution
|
| Aug 7, 2018 at 13:20 | comment | added | user129412 | I'd still be interested, if you could find the time at some point. Hope moving was smooth! | |
| Apr 13, 2018 at 13:43 | comment | added | user129412 | That is perfectly fine for me, I'd be very interested once youre settled and have some time. For now, this will do though, I can finish my design! | |
| Apr 13, 2018 at 13:42 | vote | accept | user129412 | ||
| Apr 13, 2018 at 11:54 | comment | added | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ |
It's backwards; Mathematica needs the parameter, while your references use the modulus. Yes, the WorkingPrecision -> 30 is a bit of a crutch; I have an idea on how to stabilize the formula, but you'll have to wait a while, since I'm in the middle of moving to a new place.
|
|
| Apr 13, 2018 at 11:52 | comment | added | user129412 | Based on your math.SE post and and the literature, I indeed agree that I made a mistake in using the parameter m instead of the modulus k. Even with that fix though, one still requires WorkingPrecision -> 30 to get the plotting to work. What would be the best way to have the formula give output by itself? Use something like N[m4p, 30]? | |
| Apr 13, 2018 at 2:40 | history | answered | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |