Timeline for How to program a F::argx message?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2018 at 20:03 | comment | added | b3m2a1 | @QuantumDot ah hmm, I remember the difference being subtle. It might be just in the message or the return or something. Just pick one and be consistent I figure. | |
| Aug 6, 2018 at 19:45 | comment | added | QuantumDot |
Hmm.. it seems Arguments itself can provide option checking: Options[f] = {opt1 -> x}; System`Private`Arguments[f[a, b, c], {1, 2}, g]
|
|
| Aug 6, 2018 at 17:34 | comment | added | b3m2a1 |
@QuantumDot ArgumentsWithRules provides options checking for us. See this and this
|
|
| Aug 6, 2018 at 14:24 | comment | added | QuantumDot |
Do you know what is the difference between System`Private`Arguments and System`Private`ArgumentsWithRules? They seem to behave in the same way. Also, it seems to color the f black in the front end just be calling it like System`Private`ArgumentsWithRules[f[a, b], {1, 2}, g] from a fresh kernel.
|
|
| Jan 20, 2018 at 23:21 | history | answered | b3m2a1 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |