Timeline for How to ImageRestyle high-res images?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
34 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 19, 2023 at 5:33 | answer | added | Vitaliy Kaurov | timeline score: 1 | |
S Feb 22, 2020 at 8:00 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Feb 22, 2020 at 8:00 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Feb 15, 2020 at 6:05 | comment | added | M.R. | Yes that makes it faster but not higher resolution | |
Feb 15, 2020 at 5:44 | comment | added | LouisB |
In MMA 12.0, ImageRestyle has the (experimental) TargetDevice -> "GPU" option, for those who have the supported hardware. See the Details section of the docs for a list of supported HW
|
|
S Feb 14, 2020 at 6:58 | history | bounty started | M.R. | ||
S Feb 14, 2020 at 6:58 | history | notice added | M.R. | Authoritative reference needed | |
Jul 2, 2019 at 14:13 | comment | added | M.R. | @Fortsaint "Use a bigger machine" wasn't the answer I'm hoping for lol | |
Jun 28, 2019 at 8:26 | comment | added | Fortsaint | Install the free Wolfram Engine on a big cloud instance. On AWS you can go up to 2 Tera of RAM. Check github.com/Ludwiggle/JWLS to connect to a remote kernel | |
S Jun 7, 2019 at 0:03 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Jun 7, 2019 at 0:03 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Jun 3, 2019 at 2:12 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 40 characters in body
|
Jun 2, 2019 at 22:38 | comment | added | M.R. | “The biggest limitation of Mathematica is that it doesn’t scale well” | |
S May 29, 2019 at 22:07 | history | bounty started | M.R. | ||
S May 29, 2019 at 22:07 | history | notice added | M.R. | Authoritative reference needed | |
Apr 14, 2018 at 16:50 | history | edited | José Antonio Díaz Navas | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body
|
S Oct 26, 2017 at 18:51 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
S Oct 26, 2017 at 18:51 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
Oct 24, 2017 at 8:00 | comment | added | José Antonio Díaz Navas |
@M.R. No way for larger images. However, I have tried to downscale the image, then restyle, and, again, to upscale it. The idea can work as the restyling seems to blur the resulting image a bit. So, upscaling should not show a clear detail reduction. Using ImageResize in downscaling as well as in upscaling, with a proper resampling, could help to minimize the effect of reducing details.
|
|
Oct 23, 2017 at 19:23 | comment | added | José Antonio Díaz Navas | It seems that it is a RAM issue, I mean, how much RAM you have. I was successful with a 1600x1200 image. Oh, I have an iMac with a 12 Gb RAM and running macOS Sierra 10.13, and MMA ver 11.2. Now trying a greater image... | |
Oct 23, 2017 at 4:31 | comment | added | b3m2a1 |
I tried using Inpaint on the partition edges to smooth them. It's reasonably effective.
|
|
S Oct 18, 2017 at 17:45 | history | bounty started | M.R. | ||
S Oct 18, 2017 at 17:45 | history | notice added | M.R. | Draw attention | |
Oct 5, 2017 at 15:33 | history | edited | Szabolcs |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 5, 2017 at 15:22 | comment | added | yode |
In my 32G memory machine,I think it is possible.. :)
|
|
Oct 5, 2017 at 15:13 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 72 characters in body; edited tags
|
Oct 2, 2017 at 16:22 | comment | added | M.R. | If we could somehow enforce edge constraints on the sub windows the partitioning idea might work. | |
Oct 2, 2017 at 15:38 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 746 characters in body
|
Sep 20, 2017 at 7:49 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/910410474273017856 | ||
Sep 19, 2017 at 18:01 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 164 characters in body; edited title
|
Sep 19, 2017 at 1:10 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Sep 18, 2017 at 23:07 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Sep 18, 2017 at 22:39 | history | edited | M.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 96 characters in body
|
Sep 18, 2017 at 22:31 | history | asked | M.R. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |