Timeline for How to use Working Precision to get good result and plot?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2017 at 18:16 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Nov 2, 2017 at 18:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Oct 3, 2017 at 17:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Sep 3, 2017 at 16:38 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 16:23 | answer | added | Bob Hanlon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 16:01 | answer | added | MarcoB | timeline score: 1 | |
| Aug 4, 2017 at 15:26 | comment | added | MarcoB |
Start by replacing 0.05379 in the definition of fon with an exact or high precision value. I'd suggest starting with 5379/100000. Do the same for any other inexact quantities in your definitions, if any.
|
|
| Aug 4, 2017 at 15:20 | history | edited | Andrea G | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 45 characters in body
|
| Aug 4, 2017 at 14:13 | history | asked | Andrea G | CC BY-SA 3.0 |