Timeline for why the integral without singularity does not converge
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2017 at 2:38 | history | edited | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected spelling
|
| Jul 21, 2017 at 20:48 | comment | added | p.s | @Michael E2 Thanks. You guys are really helpful. | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 18:17 | history | edited | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added alternative
|
| Jul 21, 2017 at 15:06 | history | edited | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added alternative
|
| Jul 21, 2017 at 14:51 | comment | added | Michael E2 |
@user64494 Thanks. AccuracyGoal sets a goal for the number of digits after the decimal point. When the result is 1, then Precision and Accuracy are the same. The corresponding AccuracyGoal for this integral would be about Accuracy[2.8471463223061835`5] or 4.54559. (The precision and accuracy goals combine, so that the absolute error estimate should be less than the sum of the errors implied by the two goals, and the correspondence is not quite as simple as I describe.)
|
|
| Jul 21, 2017 at 6:00 | comment | added | user64494 | A professional answer. Can you explain why AccuracyGoal -> 5 doesn't work well here? Thanks in advance. | |
| Jul 21, 2017 at 5:49 | history | answered | Michael E2 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |