Timeline for Numerical solution to an integral equation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 12, 2017 at 13:01 | comment | added | bbgodfrey |
Mathematica certainly can reproduce the calculation by @CraigTracy, but no further progress can be made without an expression for g[s] . Given that expression, it may be possible to use InverseLaplaceTransform to obtain the desired answer. Am alternative approach is to discretize your integral equation to form a matrix equation, which can be inverted to obtain a numerical answer.
|
|
Jul 12, 2017 at 12:44 | comment | added | Enrico M. | @bbgodfrey Since I wanted to have a mathematica code to solve that, I don't see how it should belong to Math SE, people over there won't provide me for a code in that sense... | |
Jul 12, 2017 at 4:38 | comment | added | bbgodfrey | Perhaps, this question belongs in Mathematics instead of Mathematica.SE, | |
Jul 11, 2017 at 22:40 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jun 11, 2017 at 22:09 | answer | added | Craig Tracy | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 10, 2017 at 13:46 | history | edited | m_goldberg | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 15 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Jun 10, 2017 at 13:40 | comment | added | Anton Antonov | I recently looked into a similar matrix equation. The proposed solution is that if your model allows it to change the lower boundary of the integral to be $t-c$ with $c$ a constant, then you can discretize the integral using some formula (e.g. Trapezoidal rule) and solve the obtained delay equation. | |
Jun 10, 2017 at 13:08 | history | asked | Enrico M. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |