Timeline for How to get rid of 0. (zero dot) without get rid of small number? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2017 at 2:07 | history | closed | Mr.Wizard | Duplicate of Replace very small numbers by zero in the output of a list | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Feb 25, 2017 at 1:08 | comment | added | NaC |
@JasonB. I admitted that I just know that I can use 2-argument form of Chop. It's my mistake. However, @mikado's answer can solve this problem too.
|
|
| Feb 25, 2017 at 1:04 | vote | accept | NaC | ||
| Feb 25, 2017 at 1:03 | comment | added | NaC |
@N.J.Evans The answer is yes. However, I am stuck with the problem that Re gives me Re(...). Then, I use Refine but imaginary parts still exists, Re(n1+n2*I)x y. Finally, I use Conjugate to get rid of imaginary parts and then I get this problem.
|
|
| Feb 24, 2017 at 19:44 | answer | added | mikado | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 24, 2017 at 16:22 | comment | added | N.J.Evans |
Are you trying to get rid of imaginary parts or am I misinterpreting? If so, you can use Re.
|
|
| Feb 24, 2017 at 15:01 | comment | added | Jason B. |
Would the 2-argument form of Chop suit your needs?
|
|
| Feb 24, 2017 at 14:58 | history | asked | NaC | CC BY-SA 3.0 |