Timeline for SiegelTheta provides a wrong value?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2016 at 14:51 | comment | added | Jules Lamers | @Saya you're right; I have adjusted my answer accordingly. I'm afraid I can't help! | |
| Nov 17, 2016 at 14:36 | history | edited | Jules Lamers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
improved formulation
|
| Nov 17, 2016 at 14:09 | comment | added | Saya | When evaluating the same lines a second time I also get the result evaluated with the highest precision, N[#,100], whichever of N[#,50], N[#,60],N[#,70] and N[#,100] I try to evaluate. I speculate that Mathematica may temporarily retain the result with the highest precision and reuse it in calculating the same in order to increase speed of calculation, so we may get wrong results in evaluating a second time. | |
| Nov 17, 2016 at 13:10 | history | edited | corey979 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Nov 17, 2016 at 10:46 | history | answered | Jules Lamers | CC BY-SA 3.0 |