Timeline for Gaps in curves from ParametricPlot
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Nov 8, 2016 at 12:54 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/795972698992152577 | ||
| Nov 8, 2016 at 0:43 | comment | added | george2079 |
you may want to separately plot the two functions as Show[{ParametricPlot[H],ParametricPlot[Ha]}] so that you can independently set the parameters,
|
|
| Nov 7, 2016 at 21:38 | comment | added | Szabolcs | It looks completely smooth with 11.0.1. Perhaps you should upgrade, point releases bring many bugfixes ... | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 21:22 | answer | added | Bob Hanlon | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 21:21 | comment | added | Hugh |
@Szabolcs You values are not quite enough in Version 11.0.0.PlotPoints -> 200, MaxRecursion -> 10 does not do it but then increasing the MaxRecursion to 15 does. What is odd is that in the original plot the yellow curve has a gap despite it being smooth. Is there also an issue with plotting vertically? Thanks for your input.
|
|
| Nov 7, 2016 at 19:31 | comment | added | Szabolcs |
Try MaxRecursion -> 10, PlotPoints -> 60, along Exclusions -> None. The function has some strange behaviour at that point which happens not to show up in this particular plot. Mathematica detects and excludes it anyway. Your first function has very rapid change there, thus with uniform sampling in $\beta$ it look ugly and it needs an unusually high number of recursive refinements to smooth it out.
|
|
| Nov 7, 2016 at 19:27 | comment | added | anderstood |
Side note: adding PlotPoints -> 500 makes the plot much smoother.
|
|
| Nov 7, 2016 at 19:23 | history | asked | Hugh | CC BY-SA 3.0 |