Timeline for Derivative of Interpolation parameters
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Sep 27, 2016 at 13:50 | comment | added | Breugem | I agree:) This was my (potentially unclear) comment (i.e., we cannot use the InterpolatingPolynomial from the answer above) | |
| Sep 27, 2016 at 13:12 | comment | added | Michael E2 | @Breugem Using an interpolating polynomial on more than a few points is usually a bad idea, unless your data is exact and you know a polynomial is an appropriate model. Piecewise interpolation is usually more appropriate. | |
| Sep 27, 2016 at 13:01 | history | edited | Bob Hanlon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Working directly with an InterpolatingPolynomial is more straightforward
|
| Sep 27, 2016 at 12:15 | comment | added | Breugem | This is very good! The interpolating polynomial will become complex for large grids, in which a piecewise polynomial needs to be estimated, which brings us back to the original problem. I guess the most efficient way would be to generate an interpolating polynomial from the start | |
| Sep 27, 2016 at 11:00 | history | answered | Bob Hanlon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |