Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:55 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
Aug 11, 2016 at 21:46 comment added Quark Soup I can't speak for Xavier, but removing the subscripts seems to have cleared the problem. I like the read-ability of the subscripted notebooks - it looks more like what I write by hand - but I'm having second thoughts about the practice.
Aug 11, 2016 at 14:08 comment added Michael E2 The error message shows that the value of the function is not a complex number either. Try plugging valid values in for the variables and see what you get. There's something wrong with your definition. (FWIW, I always avoid subscripts myself, except sometimes with Format[]. I also tend to avoid questions with subscripts. There are plenty of other questions without them. :)
Aug 11, 2016 at 12:14 comment added user31159 @DRAirey1 Giving FindMinimum[{chiSquared[Subscript[t, 1], Subscript[a, 0]]}, {{Subscript[t, 1], 1*^16}, {Subscript[a, 0], 1*^-14}}] works fine and produces the same result as FindMinimum[{chiSquared[t1, a0]}, {{t1, 1*^16}, {a0, 1*^-14}}] for me.
Aug 11, 2016 at 12:05 comment added Quark Soup I'm still working on it, but there seems to be a bug when using the subscript notation. You are correct, the notation I supplied seems to work. In my original notebook, the same values when subscripted (e.g. $t_1, a_0$) fail with the above message.
Aug 11, 2016 at 11:56 comment added user31159 Are you using the same definitions and values as in the post you linked to? This does not produce any error on my side.
Aug 11, 2016 at 11:42 comment added Quark Soup Apparently not. I get the same message above, but with the 'Re[<previous message>]'. Oddly, if I just take the 'chiSquared' function at the coordinates quoted in the error message (e.g. 1, 1), I get a real number.
Aug 11, 2016 at 11:40 history edited Quark Soup CC BY-SA 3.0
added 428 characters in body
Aug 11, 2016 at 11:35 comment added Feyre Can't you just wrap the function in Re[]?
Aug 11, 2016 at 11:17 history undeleted Quark Soup
Aug 11, 2016 at 11:02 history deleted Quark Soup via Vote
Aug 11, 2016 at 10:52 history asked Quark Soup CC BY-SA 3.0