Timeline for Interpolation gone awry?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2016 at 17:54 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/753649004068610049 | ||
| Jul 14, 2016 at 15:45 | comment | added | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | @Eric, surely you meant "tangent" instead of "asymptote", no? | |
| Jul 14, 2016 at 15:40 | answer | added | Eric Towers | timeline score: 0 | |
| Jul 14, 2016 at 15:24 | comment | added | Eric Towers | The suggested vertical asymptote at zero indicates working with the inverse function may be better behaved. | |
| Jul 14, 2016 at 3:28 | comment | added | m_goldberg |
The data doesn't behave much like a polynomial. Perhaps a power law fit will do? Behavior is close to x^.3
|
|
| Jul 14, 2016 at 3:13 | answer | added | m_goldberg | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 14, 2016 at 2:51 | answer | added | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 14, 2016 at 2:35 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @Young Thanks! I also found this possible duplicate: (104037) | |
| Jul 14, 2016 at 2:21 | comment | added | Young | mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/4202/… ? | |
| Jul 14, 2016 at 2:18 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard |
All: I know there is a Q&A that already describes the algorithm used by Interpolation that I believe would explain this apparently strange behavior, but I cannot find it. Does anyone recall?
|
|
| Jul 14, 2016 at 2:17 | answer | added | Young | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jul 14, 2016 at 2:08 | answer | added | Mr.Wizard | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jul 14, 2016 at 2:06 | history | edited | Mr.Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 65 characters in body
|
| Jul 14, 2016 at 1:58 | history | asked | user39464 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |