Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
Jul 11, 2016 at 3:31 history edited Young CC BY-SA 3.0
added 242 characters in body
Jul 10, 2016 at 16:50 vote accept Abdulrahman Kalbat
Jul 10, 2016 at 16:11 history edited Young CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 9 characters in body
Jul 10, 2016 at 16:09 comment added Abdulrahman Kalbat Thanks a lot for the last method. It is really smooth and the STL file created has a reasonable size now.
Jul 10, 2016 at 16:01 comment added Young @AbdulrahmanKalbat Take a look at the answer now, I've updated with a new method
Jul 10, 2016 at 16:01 history edited Young CC BY-SA 3.0
added 499 characters in body
Jul 10, 2016 at 15:56 history edited Young CC BY-SA 3.0
added 499 characters in body
Jul 10, 2016 at 15:41 history edited Young CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 242 characters in body
Jul 10, 2016 at 15:36 comment added Young Having done a significant amount of high resolution 3D printing, using the first option with a high PlotPoint number would be sufficient.
Jul 10, 2016 at 15:34 history edited Young CC BY-SA 3.0
added 96 characters in body
Jul 10, 2016 at 15:34 comment added Abdulrahman Kalbat None of the methods are giving a result that I could use for 3D printing. The sharp edges are still there.
Jul 10, 2016 at 15:26 comment added Young You can use ParametricPlot3D with your surface equation. I updated the answer. ContourPlot3D seems to be of better quality.
Jul 10, 2016 at 15:24 history edited Young CC BY-SA 3.0
added 35 characters in body
Jul 10, 2016 at 15:17 comment added Abdulrahman Kalbat Is the ParametricPlot3D even plotting the same plot? It is not and I don't think I could use 3 variables with this. Extrusion is giving distortion again.
Jul 10, 2016 at 15:13 history edited Young CC BY-SA 3.0
added 207 characters in body
Jul 10, 2016 at 15:08 history answered Young CC BY-SA 3.0