Timeline for Why NIntegrate is badly-behaved on $J_{\frac{9}{2}}(x)$ by default?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathematica.stackexchange.com/ with https://mathematica.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Jun 10, 2016 at 4:40 | vote | accept | xzczd♦ | ||
Jun 9, 2016 at 6:09 | comment | added | xzczd♦ | @j.m OK, I started a new question. | |
Jun 9, 2016 at 3:58 | comment | added | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ |
I think, @xzczd, that the way to answer that would involve the IntegrationMonitor framework that Anton introduced to us previously. Which would be an interesting separate question, I would say.
|
|
Jun 9, 2016 at 3:33 | comment | added | xzczd♦ |
@J.M. I should say I'm a little surprising, I didn't notice that NIntegrate evaluates its first argument while it owns HoldAll attribute, well, does NIntegrate always evaluate its first argument? (Maybe I should start a new question?) BTW @anton the // Expand is redundant :)
|
|
Jun 8, 2016 at 12:08 | history | edited | Anton Antonov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 327 characters in body
|
Jun 8, 2016 at 12:04 | comment | added | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ |
As an addendum: "SymbolicProcessing" -> 0 does absolutely nothing because BesselJ[] is already auto-expanded in the half-integer case, and the resulting expression is numerically iffy.
|
|
Jun 8, 2016 at 12:00 | history | edited | Anton Antonov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 163 characters in body
|
Jun 8, 2016 at 11:43 | history | answered | Anton Antonov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |