Timeline for Is this a bug in DiscretizeRegion in 10.4?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2017 at 16:50 | history | edited | RunnyKine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body
|
| Mar 26, 2017 at 16:50 | answer | added | RunnyKine | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 11, 2016 at 16:51 | history | rollback | user31159 |
Rollback to Revision 4
|
|
| Sep 11, 2016 at 16:51 | comment | added | user31159 | @mikado Please see the comment above. | |
| Sep 11, 2016 at 16:50 | comment | added | user31159 | @c186282 OK, I'm rolling back to the initial banner. | |
| Sep 11, 2016 at 12:44 | comment | added | c186282 |
This worked for me on 11.0.0 for Linux 64-bit on a fresh start of Mathematica. However, I have been using ImplicitRegion with DiscretizeRegion a lot since v 10.0 came out and I have noticed very inconsistent behavior. I have seen the same code work, then not work. It bothers me that ContourPlot is fast and correct but DiscretizeRegion is slow and inconsistent. I have made my own "DiscretizeRegion" based on extracting data from ContourPlot which works well for my special cases.
|
|
| Sep 11, 2016 at 11:46 | comment | added | user31159 | @mikado Thanks for checking, I've updated the bug banner. | |
| Sep 11, 2016 at 11:46 | history | edited | user31159 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added OS-dependent bug banner.
|
| Sep 11, 2016 at 11:42 | comment | added | mikado |
@Xavier this still fails for me "11.0.0 for Linux x86 (64-bit) (July 28, 2016)"
|
|
| Sep 11, 2016 at 11:25 | history | edited | user31159 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added bugfix version.
|
| Apr 20, 2016 at 3:16 | history | edited | Michael E2 |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 20, 2016 at 3:12 | history | edited | RunnyKine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 28 characters in body
|
| Apr 8, 2016 at 22:09 | comment | added | bobbym | Fails on Kubuntu 1510 64 bit. ilians workaround works well! +1 | |
| Apr 8, 2016 at 22:07 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMma/status/718560938434162688 | ||
| Apr 8, 2016 at 20:20 | history | edited | J. M.'s missing motivation♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags
|
| Apr 8, 2016 at 17:54 | comment | added | ilian |
This is a bug, for a workaround try Method -> "Semialgebraic".
|
|
| Apr 8, 2016 at 17:29 | comment | added | MarcoB | I can confirm that it fails on my 10.4 Win7-64 as well. | |
| Apr 8, 2016 at 17:26 | history | asked | RunnyKine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |