Timeline for How to define patterns to filter lists of replacement rules?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2016 at 10:34 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @Kuba I cannot disagree with that, but I know I got my feelings hurt once when my older question was closed as a duplicate of a newer one and I haven't forgotten that, so I always tend to favor the older question. | |
| Feb 9, 2016 at 10:33 | comment | added | Kuba | Good point (2nd lol). | |
| Feb 9, 2016 at 10:31 | comment | added | Kuba | I don't mind the order, I'm ususaly trying to link to the best topic so it will be linked in more places. | |
| Feb 9, 2016 at 10:30 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard |
@Kuba No, wait x 2. (lol) That one is about Select and this is about Cases, and while kglr answered both with an alternative the direct answer is different. I am going to leave this open after all.
|
|
| Feb 9, 2016 at 10:28 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @Kuba It would be nice if people would close things as duplicates when they are duplicates, rather than "easily found in the documentation." I am starting to think that even having that close reason is a mistake, as the same simple questions are asked repeatedly anyway. In this case I saw a closed question, noted the OP's comment, and agreed. | |
| Feb 9, 2016 at 10:25 | comment | added | Kuba | Isn't this a better place? And isn't this topic a duplicate? 69299. Moreover, what's up with @kglr 's memory? :) | |
| Feb 9, 2016 at 10:23 | history | answered | Mr.Wizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |