Timeline for Except[] with levelspec
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2016 at 14:13 | vote | accept | Shb | ||
| Feb 4, 2016 at 17:33 | answer | added | Edmund | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 4, 2016 at 16:43 | comment | added | Daniel Lichtblau | Depending on what exactly is desired from "variables", question and responses in this prior post might be of interest. | |
| Feb 4, 2016 at 15:14 | answer | added | Fred Simons | timeline score: 4 | |
| Feb 4, 2016 at 10:10 | comment | added | Mr.Wizard | @Fred Would you care to post an answer? | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 17:56 | comment | added | Shb | Thanks. Feel free to add it as answer? | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 17:32 | comment | added | Fred Simons | @Kuba I agree, with both your comments. | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 17:20 | comment | added | Kuba |
@FredSimons In such cases, I really like operators: _?(Not@*NumericQ)
|
|
| Jan 31, 2016 at 17:17 | comment | added | Kuba |
What about Variables?
|
|
| Jan 31, 2016 at 16:59 | comment | added | Fred Simons | Something like DeleteDuplicates[Cases[l1 , _?(Not[NumericQ[#]] &), {-1}]]? Observe the curly brackets around the level specification. | |
| Jan 31, 2016 at 16:45 | history | asked | Shb | CC BY-SA 3.0 |