P. Fonseca

1,985 reputation

1526

bio	website	N/A
	location	Paris, France
	age	36
visits	member for	1 year, 4 months
	seen	yesterday
stats	profile views	165

enter image description here

e-mail:

Uncompress["1:eJxTTMoPChZmYGAoKE3KyUx2SMvPK05NTtTLzEvLBwB2hgkj"]

	1,985 reputation	bio	website	N/A	visits	member for	1 year, 4 months
1526 badges		location	Paris, France		seen	yesterday

summary answers questions tags badges favorites bounties reputation activity

248 Actions

suggestions reviews revisions comments badges posts accepts all

May 12	comment	Compile not correctly initializing a variable defined inside Module Thank you all. I've just reported the bug.
May 12	revised	Compile not correctly initializing a variable defined inside Module added 9 characters in body
May 12	asked	Compile not correctly initializing a variable defined inside Module
Apr 26	comment	What technical obstacles prevent all Mathematica code compiling to C Such a compilation would be very useful, even with the entire kernel "attached" to it. It would allow a different use of Mathematica than the current ones. AFAIK, there is no runtime available as happens for MATLAB. If you want to call some user defined functions from a different environment, either you need the full Mathematica version installed, or you need to negotiate your special case with WR. I whished that our programs/functions could be more integrated into other environments.
Apr 7	awarded	Nice Answer
Apr 1	awarded	Nice Question
Mar 28	revised	NDSolve and {C, K, Slot} and other built-ins as a variable name added 7 characters in body
Mar 28	revised	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together deleted 5 characters in body
Mar 28	revised	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together added 181 characters in body
Mar 28	comment	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together It toke me some time to figure out the problem. Take a look at my following answer: mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/15672/…
Mar 28	answered	NDSolve and {C, K, Slot} and other built-ins as a variable name
Mar 28	comment	creating an API or Widget based on a Mathematica notebook probably with the future online.wolfram.com
Mar 27	comment	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together After checking, it returns something very wrong. Probably beacuase we are relating `u` and `h` in all their x dimension with `acc`, when `acc` is actually only influencing the `le` point.
Mar 27	comment	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together It already helps a little. I'm checking if results are correct. But the definition of acc for a range of x is a little artificial, considering that acc is a single point in space... But thank you anyway.
Mar 27	comment	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together @RolfMertig I get `NDSolve::delpde: Delay partial differential equations are not currently supported by NDSolve. >>`. Since there is no "delayed" problem, I imagine that there's a different way do define it. I've done: `Derivative[1, 0][acc][t, x] == bh[t, le]u[t, le], acc[0, x] == 0`
Mar 27	comment	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together @RolfMertig but it handles well the two coupled PDE (the result looks correct when cross-checking with other sources). It's only when I add the ODE that it gets confused.
Mar 27	revised	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together added 67 characters in body
Mar 27	comment	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together @PlatoManiac as stated on the problem description, the simplified example doesn't have a dependence. But once the errors are gone, I'll add it to the h[t, le] boundary (actually, something like h[t, le]==acc/100). I just thought one problem at a time. (acc is a volume, 100 is an area, and h is a height...)
Mar 27	revised	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together edited body
Mar 27	revised	NDSolve two PDE plus one ODE, together added 2 characters in body