meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 2 months |
| seen | 11 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 44 |
|
Dec 10 |
revised |
Implementing Position deleted 224 characters in body |
|
Dec 10 |
revised |
Implementing Position added 809 characters in body |
|
Dec 10 |
answered | Implementing Position |
|
Dec 10 |
answered | NDSolve and {C, K, Slot} and other built-ins as a variable name |
|
Dec 10 |
accepted | How to implement FittedModel like objects |
|
Dec 9 |
comment |
How to implement FittedModel like objects Happy it helps! Spent a night figuring this out ... simple once you see it all together :-) |
|
Dec 8 |
answered | How to implement FittedModel like objects |
|
Dec 8 |
comment |
How to implement FittedModel like objects Okay, in the end @LeonidShifrin was right ... I do really want to understand how to use DownValues/SubValues to actually implement the type of behavior something like FittedModel has. Now I am going to try and do this on my own for a bit, but when I want to ask it ... is there a way to make it clear that this is not covered by the linked to question (which just deals with the Format/Boxes issue)? |
|
Dec 8 |
comment |
How to implement FittedModel like objects @LeonidShifrin thanks ... I was doing it on a variable that contained a FittedModel not on FittedModel itself. Confusion is slowly clearing. Thanks! |
|
Dec 8 |
comment |
How to implement FittedModel like objects @LeonidShifrin a FittedModel doesn't seem to have SubValues either ... |
|
Dec 8 |
comment |
How to implement FittedModel like objects nah the close is fine. I tried searching as I had vague memories of this issue. The SubValues solves the issue well enough for me. Thanks |
|
Dec 7 |
comment |
Does Mathematica have advanced indexing? Have you kept up with this project at all? I would be interested in seeing the github if it exists. |
|
Dec 7 |
asked | How to implement FittedModel like objects |
|
Dec 6 |
revised |
Histogram: Bars not stacked, not overlapped, but side by side? added 275 characters in body |
|
Dec 6 |
answered | Histogram: Bars not stacked, not overlapped, but side by side? |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Can I make a default for an optional argument the value of another argument? super cute :-) +1 |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
NDSolve and {C, K, Slot} and other built-ins as a variable name @Szabolcs can you give your other example as an answer with the Boo example. This seems like the smoking gun for me that it is a bug and not a safety net. I can accept that and issue the bug report. |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
NDSolve and {C, K, Slot} and other built-ins as a variable name @Szabolcs yes thanks I like these points. More what I am trying to get at. You are saying that it is a specific test that Mathematica is doing to try and stop the user from getting errors. It is not something that I will be able to ever trigger with my own definitions that get shadowed since must be somehow tested for by NDSolve itself (and if so it should do the same in DSolve, 1D cases etc) and I should file a bug report. |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
NDSolve and {C, K, Slot} and other built-ins as a variable name I like this answer the most so far, as I find the idea intriguing that it is some kind of symbolic preprocessing that is causing the error. I wish I could think of a way to test this with a built in symbol that would never arise in such a context as C K and Slot all might be candidates for this |
|
Dec 4 |
revised |
NDSolve and {C, K, Slot} and other built-ins as a variable name Added major clarification to stress the interpretation of the question |
