Reputation
Next privilege 50 Rep.
Comment everywhere
Badges
5
Impact
~1k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 1 vote cast
Sep
24
awarded  Autobiographer
Jun
5
comment Monitoring the Evaluation of NDSolve: time to finish estimation
Ok edited! Thanks
Jun
5
revised Monitoring the Evaluation of NDSolve: time to finish estimation
added 502 characters in body
Jun
5
asked Monitoring the Evaluation of NDSolve: time to finish estimation
Jun
5
comment NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs
Thank you Ruebenko this helped a lot!
Jun
5
awarded  Scholar
Jun
5
awarded  Supporter
Jun
5
accepted NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs
May
5
revised NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs
deleted 3 characters in body
May
5
comment NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs
My bad ruebenko: I didn't define the Epsilon function. Now it is fixed. PS: you might want to do Ns=10 to run faster the first time you try it.
May
5
revised NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs
added 56 characters in body
Apr
28
awarded  Editor
Apr
28
comment NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs
Did it !!!!! :)
Apr
28
revised NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs
added 2671 characters in body
Apr
28
comment NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs
Thank you, ok I will do it!! I just didn't want to past a too long code. The actual definition of a,b,c,d,e,f is a little long.... I'll notify you later when I do. Thanks!
Apr
28
comment NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs
they are actually taken from a fermi-dirac distribution at a given temperature. However for the sake of the example let's fix them at zero. And the functions a,b,c,d,e which are physically scattering/absorption/excitation of phonons rates, can be taken as constant or simple sinusoidal functions of k^2+q^2 for what matters....
Apr
27
awarded  Student
Apr
27
asked NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs