ventu
Reputation
Next privilege 50 Rep.
Comment everywhere
Badges
5
Newest
Impact
~1k people reached

• 0 posts edited
• 0 helpful flags
• 1 vote cast

# 18 Actions

 Sep24 awarded Autobiographer Jun5 comment Monitoring the Evaluation of NDSolve: time to finish estimation Ok edited! Thanks Jun5 revised Monitoring the Evaluation of NDSolve: time to finish estimation added 502 characters in body Jun5 asked Monitoring the Evaluation of NDSolve: time to finish estimation Jun5 comment NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs Thank you Ruebenko this helped a lot! Jun5 awarded Scholar Jun5 awarded Supporter Jun5 accepted NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs May5 revised NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs deleted 3 characters in body May5 comment NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs My bad ruebenko: I didn't define the Epsilon function. Now it is fixed. PS: you might want to do Ns=10 to run faster the first time you try it. May5 revised NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs added 56 characters in body Apr28 awarded Editor Apr28 comment NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs Did it !!!!! :) Apr28 revised NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs added 2671 characters in body Apr28 comment NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs Thank you, ok I will do it!! I just didn't want to past a too long code. The actual definition of a,b,c,d,e,f is a little long.... I'll notify you later when I do. Thanks! Apr28 comment NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs they are actually taken from a fermi-dirac distribution at a given temperature. However for the sake of the example let's fix them at zero. And the functions a,b,c,d,e which are physically scattering/absorption/excitation of phonons rates, can be taken as constant or simple sinusoidal functions of k^2+q^2 for what matters.... Apr27 awarded Student Apr27 asked NDSolve for a large system of simple ODEs