network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 4 months |
| seen | 6 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 3 |
|
7h |
comment |
Graphics updating from inside double-Fold-iteration within Manipulate It works, thanks! I also figured out the meaning of {{v, v}, ControlType -> None}: Because controls format are executed in advance to the Initialization options. So when firstly executing control, a undefined symbol v is asigned to the variable v; then while executing initialization, the symbol v is defined to be a function name, therefore the variable v now will be automatically recognized by the local master kernel as a function name. |
|
12h |
comment |
Graphics updating from inside double-Fold-iteration within Manipulate @ Michael E2 This problem is clearly addressed in your second solution, which I appreciate better, because it offers more controls and freedom. But I am still curious to know if we can show both g and k in the Button solution :) |
|
12h |
comment |
Graphics updating from inside double-Fold-iteration within Manipulate @Micheal E2 I just got a trival question: In your Button solution, the current value of k can not be shown even with {Dynamic[k], Dynamic[g]}, because the evaluation is done outside the main body. I wonder if we could show both k and g simultaneously? |
|
12h |
comment |
Graphics updating from inside double-Fold-iteration within Manipulate Your solution exactly solves my problem, thank you Micheal E2! |
|
12h |
accepted | Graphics updating from inside double-Fold-iteration within Manipulate |
|
14h |
comment |
Graphics updating from inside double-Fold-iteration within Manipulate I managed to come up with a possible solution, but this one may have efficiency issue. Hope someone can help to improve it. |
|
14h |
answered | Graphics updating from inside double-Fold-iteration within Manipulate |
|
16h |
comment |
Graphics updating from inside double-Fold-iteration within Manipulate Yes you are right. Actually me current code is just in the first form you provided. However I want to submit my FEM code to WolframDemonstrationProject, so I will have to convert it using Manipulate. Still, thanks for your second code, there is something new to me. |
|
1d |
asked | Graphics updating from inside double-Fold-iteration within Manipulate |
|
1d |
awarded | Informed |
|
Apr 15 |
awarded | Suffrage |
|
Apr 7 |
accepted | Automatically tracing and keeping ViewPoints in a list while manually rotating 3D graphics |
|
Apr 7 |
comment |
Automatically tracing and keeping ViewPoints in a list while manually rotating 3D graphics Adopting Szabolcs's code, we can also write something like: vprec = {}; vvrec{}; then change the Dynamic[vp, (vp = #; vprec = list[vprec, #]) &] to Dynamic[vp, (vp = #; AppendTo[vprec, #]&]. This makes the code easier to read, but may decrease performance in complex situation. |
|
Apr 7 |
comment |
Automatically tracing and keeping ViewPoints in a list while manually rotating 3D graphics Amazing! I will need to go deep into Dynamic... Thanks! |
|
Apr 7 |
comment |
Automatically tracing and keeping ViewPoints in a list while manually rotating 3D graphics @Szabolcs: I just hope to do as many things as possible from within Mathematica :) |
|
Apr 7 |
asked | Automatically tracing and keeping ViewPoints in a list while manually rotating 3D graphics |
|
Feb 20 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Feb 20 |
comment |
NDSolve problem with matrix valued function Add: I mean still using the compact way of expressing the equation. |
|
Feb 20 |
comment |
NDSolve problem with matrix valued function I have an additional question: Since σxy and σyx are identical, can we just tell Mathematica this and thus accelerate the calculation? |
|
Feb 20 |
comment |
DensityPlot on spherical surface? This is more closely related to my question. Thank you VLC! |
