meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 3 months |
| seen | 9 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 177 |
|
Mar 27 |
asked | Problem with PlayerPro recognizing a proprietary package |
|
Mar 27 |
revised |
Why are these flow lines cut short? Added plot |
|
Mar 27 |
comment |
ListPointPlot3D seen from above @Szabolcs -- I don't mind at all. Thanks. |
|
Mar 26 |
comment |
Phase space vector field Can you post more of your work up to this point? If you can, it will make for a much more interesting question and will likely get lots of interesting answers. |
|
Mar 26 |
comment |
ListPointPlot3D seen from above +1 from me. I like both of these. |
|
Mar 26 |
answered | ListPointPlot3D seen from above |
|
Mar 26 |
comment |
DSolve fails to solve second order PDE Nice to have a @Afriendlyhelper around... Welcome to the site. |
|
Mar 26 |
comment |
Is there a way to check whether two notebooks share the same variables? The rule of 3 makes lots of sense. Still, packaging has a cost & tradeoffs. Mma can spoils us because one can so easily alter code. When I need to think thru a problem I fall into refactoring code - generalize, making it more concise, or just improving variable names. This seems to let my subconscious work on the more complicated problem & I get better code for it. But, I can fall down in having the discipline to apply such refactoring to packaged code. Getting the right level of abstraction so that packaged code can have a reasonable life expectancy presents an interesting challenge. |
|
Mar 26 |
answered | DSolve fails to solve second order PDE |
|
Mar 26 |
answered | Placeholders for map inside a map |
|
Mar 26 |
comment |
What is the equivalent of TogglerBar that will work with Manipulate? I think you've asked good questions. Mathematica leaves all of us with lots to learn. This site helps all of learn more. Welcome and thanks for participating. |
|
Mar 26 |
comment |
How to select interactively datasets to plot with Manipulate At this point, I don't have a clue about what you really want Clarifying a question helps everyone. Changing what you want from a question disregards the efforts that people make in producing answers. Two seeming good answers have come for this question. I'd recommend accepting the best of them (mine! mine! Mine! ;-) then giving some more thought to formulating and submitting a second question. |
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
How to select interactively datasets to plot with Manipulate @Federico -- Odd. Works perfectly for me with any and all combinations of the different checkboxes. I run version 9. Under what version have you tried this? |
|
Mar 25 |
answered | How to select interactively datasets to plot with Manipulate |
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
How to make Mathematica returns the exact expression I typed Just edit the question and paste in the actual code. This makes for a better question and a better site. |
|
Mar 23 |
comment |
How can I suppress message “… cannot be used as function”? @Gasper -- Great, vote him up. He deserves it, but do consider better structuring your code. IT will vastly simplify your life ;-) |
|
Mar 23 |
comment |
How can I suppress message “… cannot be used as function”? @Federico -- No claim it works, just trying to sort through some of the confusion. |
|
Mar 23 |
revised |
How can I suppress message “… cannot be used as function”? expanded answer |
|
Mar 23 |
answered | How can I suppress message “… cannot be used as function”? |
|
Mar 22 |
answered | Solving a differential equation for a variable in a function |
