| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Frankfurt, Germany | |
| age | 54 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 2 months |
| seen | 11 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 130 |
Physicist, scientist, using Mathematica for more than 20yrs. Working on light microscopy, three-dimensional microscopy, light sheet-based fluorescence microscopy.
|
Apr 8 |
comment |
Functions, Options and Symbols @ J.M. PlotRange is definitely dcumented only as an option. How did you figure this one out? It is also not a general means for retrieving Options values. Very nice. |
|
Mar 14 |
comment |
Making Axes logarithmic in 3d plots Maybe still more for future versions of Mathematica but the option ScalingFunctions -> {"Log", "Reverse"} has been introduced for Gauges, Histograms and BarCharts in version 9. Unluckily, it fails in number of instances. I reported this as an error a while ago. Since the implementation is very general, I cannot see why it should not also become available for all other Plot-related functions. |
|
Mar 3 |
comment |
How do I change the way Mathematica pronounces English words (e.g. “futile” is not pronounced correctly)? Here is another one: Speak["You are hoss-tile."] |
|
Mar 2 |
comment |
How do I change the way Mathematica pronounces English words (e.g. “futile” is not pronounced correctly)? I have not heard about Borgs in Berlin, but then who was JFK? |
|
Mar 2 |
comment |
How do I change the way Mathematica pronounces English words (e.g. “futile” is not pronounced correctly)? Collins collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/futile confirms the expected pronounciation. |
|
Mar 2 |
comment |
How do I change the way Mathematica pronounces English words (e.g. “futile” is not pronounced correctly)? A brilliant work-around. The orthography is deteriorating but the pronounciation is improving. |
|
Feb 14 |
comment |
Forming Cone with Tube fails to work in version 9.0.1 Thanks for the comments and the workaround, I came up with another solution, but I have to admitt that 'Disk3D' had eluded me. I will reprot this as an error to Wolfram. |
|
Feb 9 |
comment |
ScalingFunctions not working properly for x-axis I mentioned a problem with ScalingFunctions in "mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/16557/…; and reported a bug to Wolfram. This might be a more serious issue. |
|
Jan 8 |
comment |
Import a file only if it contains a certain pattern In Mathematica 9 ImageFileApply and ImageFileScan "can be used to read, process, and write successive blocks of data from a very large image file whose size could exceed available memory", i.e. to process without excessive loading. |
|
Dec 13 |
comment |
What bugs have you found in mathematica 9? If SE is the right place for good programming practice then it is definitely also a good place for bug reports. |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Circular AngularGauge does not roll over boundaries @ cormullion Yes, that is the reason. I would like to see the 0, 20, ... and 340. |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Circular AngularGauge does not roll over boundaries A magnetic compass is also a physical gauge and would certainly roll over. |
|
Dec 4 |
comment |
Circular AngularGauge does not roll over boundaries Trust me, I tried all the obvious stuff and I am aware of the the ScaleOrigin option. I want to see 90° at the top. In your response 360 and 0 are also printed on top of each other. |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Insert $+$, $-$, $\times$, $/$, $($, $)$ into $123456789$ to make it equal to $100$ @xzczd Chris' solution may not be complete for your application but it should point you in the right direction. |
|
Nov 21 |
comment |
How to retrieve the parameters calculated and used by ImageAdjust? Thanks for the extensive answers. I conclude the question as answered. Maybe one could add another parameter to ImageAdjust in a future 9.x version such as {img, {c, b, gamma}} = ImageAdjust[..., "ReturnParameters"]. |
|
Nov 21 |
comment |
How to retrieve the parameters calculated and used by ImageAdjust? Thank you very much. That is neat, is very well presented and works well. But a) it is not really what I asked for and b) it is fairly slow. The actual issue is, the values have already been calculated by ImageAdjust and I wonder if there isn't a simple way to get them with the adjusted image. |
|
Feb 22 |
comment |
Switching off Dynamic updating on a cell by cell basis When used with Dynamic[Refresh[DateString[], UpdateInterval -> 1]] Off works, but On does not. But evaluating the command restarts the code. Very nice, just what I was looking for. |