meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 3 months |
| seen | Apr 14 '12 at 19:00 | |
| stats | profile views | 40 |
|
Apr 27 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Apr 10 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Feb 27 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Feb 26 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Feb 22 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Feb 20 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Nov 24 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
Replacing composite variables by a single variable Thanks for your post Andrzej. Do you recommend using PolynomialReduce for general replacements? I noticed that using Simplify is computationally demanding (compared to replace /.) even for very simple substitutions. |
|
Mar 25 |
accepted | Replacing composite variables by a single variable |
|
Mar 25 |
comment |
Replacing composite variables by a single variable Thanks, I figured it out about the same time as you and RM. Sorry to edit. I'm hoping to find a general way to make a substitution that does not require analysis of the FullForm and construction of an elaborate replacement syntax. |
|
Mar 25 |
revised |
Replacing composite variables by a single variable added 585 characters in body |
|
Mar 25 |
asked | Replacing composite variables by a single variable |
|
Mar 25 |
accepted | Using a function name instead of its definition in AxesLabel |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
ordering of functional eigenvalues @murray: VitaliyKaurov added the Log[...] example to his answer in response to my suggestion, subsequent to my comment about the trigonometric expression being essentially numeric. |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
ordering of functional eigenvalues @murray. You need to follow the edit history of the conversation. The example I referred to in the comment addressed to VitaliyKaurov was the trigonometric one ( 1/2 (Sin[1] + Sqrt[5 + 12 Cos[2] + 6 Cos[4] + 4 Cos[6] + 4 Cos[8] + 2 Cos[12]] Sin[3] + Sin[5] + Sin[9])), which is most certainly numeric. The Log[...] example was one I proposed myself, and is of course non-numeric, as I pointed out in my comment addressed to you yesterday. |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Using a function name instead of its definition in AxesLabel Thanks Jens. Is HoldForm@InputForm the same as HoldForm[InputForm[...]]? |
|
Mar 21 |
accepted | Pasting $\LaTeX$ into a Mathematica notebook |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Using a function name instead of its definition in AxesLabel Thanks R.M. A question about the syntax. The #, & seems to be a cooptation of the pure function syntax, whereby the {"x","sinc(x)"} are substituted into the #. How about the /@? This suggests to me an effect similar to /. # -> {"x","sinc(x)"}, but I'm not familiar with /@ per se. |
|
Mar 21 |
revised |
Using a function name instead of its definition in AxesLabel added 219 characters in body |
|
Mar 21 |
asked | Using a function name instead of its definition in AxesLabel |
