meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 4 months |
| seen | Apr 9 at 14:13 | |
| stats | profile views | 1 |
|
Mar 21 |
accepted | Problem using NDSolve |
|
Mar 21 |
comment |
Problem using NDSolve Thanks very much! |
|
Mar 21 |
asked | Problem using NDSolve |
|
Mar 11 |
comment |
Problem when merging cells including commentary Thanks very much for the helpful comments, I'll upgrade then. |
|
Mar 8 |
asked | Problem when merging cells including commentary |
|
Mar 8 |
answered | bar and hat only apply to certain letters |
|
Feb 28 |
comment |
Problem displaying eps exported histograms in Word 2010 Oh so Mathematica exported EPS histograms work fine on your machines? My system is Mathematica 9, Word 2010 and Windows 7. By the way Word 2010 only displays the preview image integrated into PostScript code. EPS output in Word on the monitor always looks crappy, but perfect in print. |
|
Feb 26 |
comment |
Problem displaying eps exported histograms in Word 2010 Thanks for your swift comments. I tried both printing to pdf and printing to paper and in both cases it only shows "This image cannot currently be displayed", the same message as in word,perhaps some standard error image. I want to use EPS because the quality of the plots is much better. EMF shows compression artifacts. Also I posted the question here as I thought it might be a bug in Mathematica which messes up only the histogram EPS code, but not the EPS code of any other plot. |
|
Feb 26 |
asked | Problem displaying eps exported histograms in Word 2010 |
|
Feb 11 |
comment |
Derivative of a spline approximation One important difference between the two methods is, as far as I know, that Interpolation[] does an interpolation and forces the spline to go through all the data points, while BSplineFunction[] creates a smoothing spline, which only uses the points as knots, but doesn't pass through them. I wanted to use a smoothing spline to decrease the level of noise in the derivative. |
|
Feb 8 |
accepted | Array of functions, evaluation in plot |
|
Feb 8 |
revised |
Derivative of a spline approximation added 48 characters in body |
|
Jan 29 |
revised |
Derivative of a spline approximation added 260 characters in body |
|
Jan 28 |
revised |
Derivative of a spline approximation added 4 characters in body |
|
Jan 24 |
revised |
Array of functions, evaluation in plot added 2 characters in body |
|
Jan 24 |
comment |
Array of functions, evaluation in plot The problem with using comp[i_] := {tfunc[t][[i]], yfunc[t][[i]]} is that first every function in the vector gets evaluated only to choose one value of interest in the end. This is of course no problem in the toy model i*t, but takes more time with longer arrays and more complicated functions. |
|
Jan 24 |
comment |
Array of functions, evaluation in plot Yes this works fine. Thanks! This resolved the first case. I mixed up t and i. Edited the post to correct this. |
|
Jan 24 |
revised |
Array of functions, evaluation in plot deleted 282 characters in body |
|
Jan 24 |
asked | Array of functions, evaluation in plot |
|
Jan 23 |
revised |
Derivative of a spline approximation edited tags |
