| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 4 months |
| seen | 6 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 8 |
|
May 19 |
comment |
Overloading conjugate operator for a particular function Ok @gpap, I followed your advice, hope you don't mind! :) |
|
May 19 |
accepted | Overloading conjugate operator for a particular function |
|
May 19 |
answered | Overloading conjugate operator for a particular function |
|
May 19 |
revised |
Overloading conjugate operator for a particular function deleted 739 characters in body |
|
May 17 |
revised |
Overloading conjugate operator for a particular function added 660 characters in body |
|
May 17 |
revised |
Overloading conjugate operator for a particular function added 262 characters in body |
|
May 17 |
comment |
Overloading conjugate operator for a particular function I am aware that I can use assumptions, but this is not what I want. |
|
May 17 |
revised |
Overloading conjugate operator for a particular function edited title |
|
May 17 |
revised |
Overloading conjugate operator for a particular function added 2 characters in body |
|
May 17 |
asked | Overloading conjugate operator for a particular function |
|
May 9 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
May 9 |
comment |
How do I expand a sum? How can one make the 2a and 2b factors come out in front of the sums? (and in general any variables that do not depend on the summation index)? |
|
May 8 |
accepted | Symbolic manipulation of functional form |
|
May 7 |
awarded | Editor |
|
May 7 |
revised |
Symbolic manipulation of functional form added 148 characters in body |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Symbolic manipulation of functional form thanks, this works for the above example, but unfortunately my (real) expression also has terms of the form: Conjugate[a]*f[t] and Conjugate[b]*Conjugate[c], for which it fails |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Symbolic manipulation of functional form the expression i put is just a simplification, in the general case it contains a lot more terms with much higher orders, so i would need very many rules |
|
May 7 |
asked | Symbolic manipulation of functional form |
|
Mar 17 |
comment |
Using mesh for a single function inside Plot Yes, that's true, I just wanted to get the visuals of the answer in a single plot command. |
|
Feb 8 |
answered | Using mesh for a single function inside Plot |