network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 3 months |
| seen | May 7 at 15:13 | |
| stats | profile views | 26 |
|
Mar 1 |
comment |
Copying a symbol using a subpackage I wrote the package to copy the names new from scratch and then it worked. The old one and the one written from scratch look equal to me. I don't have a clue, what was wrong with the old one, but now it works. |
|
Mar 1 |
accepted | Copying a symbol using a subpackage |
|
Mar 1 |
revised |
Copying a symbol using a subpackage Updated with a solution. |
|
Mar 1 |
comment |
Copying a symbol using a subpackage When i copy my one testfunction from production to the ``A```-setting copying works, using exactely the same copy (not set to private, just other Package/SubPackage Name, even hence having the same function name) won't work. I have no clue, where there's any difference left. |
|
Mar 1 |
comment |
Copying a symbol using a subpackage Running that after Loading A and at least Sub1 in a Notebook on a freshly started Kernel just works fine. With full contexts. But even if i define copy in Global context just Needs A`Sub2 won't work (neither does that work with a Sub2-local copy) to copy f to g in their contexts (tried putting none, one (each) and both in Context of their packages. |
|
Mar 1 |
comment |
Copying a symbol using a subpackage Yes, it is loaded, there is only one minor difference. The function f is defined in A`Sub1 (which is also loaded and in the ContextPath), there are some Messages (because I still have to work on one unrelated ::usage), but none related to that. In A`Sub2` I set `copy` to private and copy a function (say `f` to `g`) and doing that manually (in the notebook corresponding to `TestA`) works fine, but using the Sub2`` package the problem persists as described above (though for the MWE it works and I transcribed the solution letter by letter checked three times). |
|
Mar 1 |
comment |
Copying a symbol using a subpackage Thanks, I think setting copy private is a good idea, but up to know, I'm not able to adapt the answer (which works fine for the MWE) to the production code - though I checked character by character - the function does not get copied :/ |
|
Mar 1 |
comment |
Copying a symbol using a subpackage Well for the MWE from above both approaches work fine - adapting that to my original package, nothing's changed there - but I'll check that slowly again now, whether i missed something (though there is not much to miss). |
|
Mar 1 |
comment |
Copying a symbol using a subpackage Oh. Didn't think of that one, because it's a sub package. I adapted your idea and used BeginPackage["A`Sub`",{"A`"}] (and learned about the double ticks), it works. Though my eyes hurt, that the subpackage has to load it's parent; but I'll have to get used to that I think. Works fine :) |
|
Mar 1 |
asked | Copying a symbol using a subpackage |
|
Feb 23 |
comment |
Define a second name for a function Wow! I tried to search some words, but didn't come up with those; actually your posted Question does even more that I wanted. With the mentioned Operator that even gets nicer than i thought. It's perfect - and you were very fast :) |
|
Feb 23 |
asked | Define a second name for a function |
|
Feb 15 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jan 15 |
comment |
Percentage axis ticks Would it fit to your approach to use the label, i.e. somethin like AxesLabel -> {"your x-axis label", "something in %"} and leave the TicksLabels` as they are (and hence keep the MinorTicks ? |
|
Jan 4 |
comment |
Best Practice to write ::usage for own package functions @Nasser i just checked some other packages (non standard Mathematica but from the Library online) and many delevopers use functions starting with capital letters, e.g. IntegerSmithForm. I don't know, which would be better Mathematica Programming Practice... |
|
Dec 24 |
awarded | Enthusiast |
|
Dec 23 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Dec 23 |
accepted | Number format in Legend Labels |
|
Dec 22 |
comment |
Number format in Legend Labels Actually performing a further Floor[exp] is o good idea in order to get a decent scale (an not just $10^{-2.089744433}$ ;) |
|
Dec 22 |
revised |
Number format in Legend Labels Added second version. |
