Reputation
903
Next privilege 1,000 Rep.
See votes, expandable usercard
Badges
4 17
Impact
~8k people reached

1d
awarded  Self-Learner
1d
accepted How to define $\operatorname{Mc}$ and $\operatorname{Ms}$ Mathieu functions in terms of MathieuC and MathieuS?
1d
revised How to define $\operatorname{Mc}$ and $\operatorname{Ms}$ Mathieu functions in terms of MathieuC and MathieuS?
edited body
1d
answered How to define $\operatorname{Mc}$ and $\operatorname{Ms}$ Mathieu functions in terms of MathieuC and MathieuS?
May
18
comment How to make Mathematica show matrices and vectors nicely
@Mr.Wizard I also thought to flag it for this, but this one actually is a really different question.
May
16
awarded  Revival
May
16
revised Is MathieuC for moderately large imaginary arguments broken?
Use arbitrary precision in plots to rule out insufficiency of machine precision
May
16
answered Anti-aliasing not working in Mathematica 10 and Linux
May
16
comment Is MathieuC for moderately large imaginary arguments broken?
@OleksandrR. your suggested command fails for z>=6 because of too small $MaxExtraPrecision (messages are visible when doing ListPlot of Table instead of just Plot), but yeah, it seems a bit more robust than working with machine precision. I'll update the question.
May
14
comment Is MathieuC for moderately large imaginary arguments broken?
@Histograms where did you see such a requirement? I checked built-in docs in MMA 9 and 10 as well as online documentation and didn't see it. The only thing in P&R section is that for some machine-precision arguments the precision is insufficient, and one has to use higher precision in N (or just supply numbers with higher precision, not necessarily exact). In any case, I've given an example of exact arguments and N in the OP, with the same wrong results.
May
13
revised Is MathieuC for moderately large imaginary arguments broken?
deleted 6 characters in body
May
13
answered How to solve numerically an equation which contains numerical intergration?
May
12
comment In 10.1.0 BenchmarkPlot doesn't work?
Hmm, so they removed IndexBy, but forgot to update BenchmarkPlot? And actually it looks very strange to remove a function in a minor update...
May
11
accepted Why isn't Table iterator value inserted in failed NIntegrate arguments?
May
11
comment Why isn't Table iterator value inserted in failed NIntegrate arguments?
Great, this makes it clear, thanks.
May
11
revised Is MathieuC for moderately large imaginary arguments broken?
edited body
May
11
comment Why isn't Table iterator value inserted in failed NIntegrate arguments?
Hmm, so does this mean that the unevaluated form is returned by Table as a specially handled thing, not as a result of evaluation? I.e. if we had noIntegrate[z], it'd be returned as noIntegrate["inside Block"] for undefined noIntegrate, while if noIntegrate call were to fail, it'd be returned as noIntegrate[z], right?
May
11
comment Why isn't Table iterator value inserted in failed NIntegrate arguments?
@FredSimons great, this could be made an answer.
May
11
asked Why isn't Table iterator value inserted in failed NIntegrate arguments?
May
11
awarded  Nice Question