| bio | website | mathematica.stackexchange.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | United States | |
| age | 36 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 4 months |
| seen | 8 hours ago | |
| stats | profile views | 1,235 |
The gravatar was made with Mathematica, and inspired by this.
The contents of my posts are my own opinion, and do not reflect the opinions of my employer.
|
15h |
comment |
Filtering the elements of an array to split them into two categories @cormullion on some level expecting some familiarity with the syntax is expected. However, we all had to learn it somewhere, and it took me longer than I care to admit to find this tutorial on shorthand notations. Of course, it seems to contain a number of things, so it is a good link, in general. |
|
16h |
comment |
Filtering the elements of an array to split them into two categories @cormullion Searching for @ returns a single reference which has to do with output formatting, and it is not immediately clear that f@x is equivalent to f[x]. Some interpretation is required to achieve that. |
|
20h |
comment |
Why is there no PositionFunction in Mathematica? I find it funny that I really only started to use Position after participating here. I think this site has warped my sensibilities. :D |
|
1d |
revised |
Problems with RootLocusPlot formatted code |
|
May 18 |
awarded | Excavator |
|
May 18 |
comment |
Can one identify the design patterns of Mathematica? To augment your discussion of self-blocking code, sometimes you don't need to remove existing definitions, but add to them. So, Internal`InheritedBlock is useful, instead. I recently did this in a recursive descent parser I wrote where I needed to add additional behaviors to the children of some of the tokens. |
|
May 18 |
revised |
Modules that initialize themselves on first call added missing " to fix syntax highlighting |
|
May 17 |
comment |
Why my Mathematica 9.0.1 wont work with some samples of Mathematica in Graph Theory? @Szabolcs already reported. |
|
May 17 |
comment |
Why my Mathematica 9.0.1 wont work with some samples of Mathematica in Graph Theory? I put the InputForm of the graph into a code block. Look at the [revisions][mathematica.stackexchange.com/posts/25410/revisions] to see what I did, or better yet, the edit window. |
|
May 17 |
revised |
Why my Mathematica 9.0.1 wont work with some samples of Mathematica in Graph Theory? put in input form of code; spelling, grammar |
|
May 17 |
comment |
Why my Mathematica 9.0.1 wont work with some samples of Mathematica in Graph Theory? A couple of things. First, you are trying to post the full box structure of something, and stackexchange does not interpret that correctly. Since you mention the documentation, can you post a link to it and someone might be able to get something better working. Second, the grave marks ( ` ) are for inline formatting only. To set up a code block, indent by four spaces. |
|
May 17 |
revised |
Importing LTSpice data into mathematica added comments to the code |
|
May 17 |
revised |
Importing LTSpice data into mathematica reformatted code, slightly |
|
May 17 |
answered | Importing LTSpice data into mathematica |
|
May 16 |
comment |
List of Tribonacci Polynomials with Mathematica? @bills true, but he had f[4] := x^4 + x. Of course, he's missing a few terms ... |
|
May 16 |
comment |
Add a sub-matrix of zeros in big matrix @AlejandroGuarnizo are you using the function BlockDiagonalRiffle or are you using BlockDiagonal@Riffle? Also, try restarting the kernel, and see if that changes anything. If that doesn't work, post two small matrices that it doesn't work with and I'll go from there. |
|
May 16 |
comment |
List of Tribonacci Polynomials with Mathematica? Incidentally, the grave marks ( ` ) only perform inline code formatting. To put into block form, precede each line with four spaces, and don't wrap it in the grave marks. Look at my revisions to see what I mean. |
|
May 16 |
revised |
List of Tribonacci Polynomials with Mathematica? formatted code |
|
May 16 |
comment |
List of Tribonacci Polynomials with Mathematica? You skipped t[3]. Also, you should space out you definitions a bit more for readability; putting them on separate lines, generally, works well. |
|
May 16 |
comment |
Add a sub-matrix of zeros in big matrix @AlejandroGuarnizo the key is apparently using the appropriate clustering algorithm. I added Method -> "Agglomerate" to FindClusters and it seems to work. It will even find off-diagonal blocks. Of course, BlockDiagonalRiffle only works correctly with block diagonal matrices, but that is a detail. Try it out, and let me know if it stands up to your testing. |