| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 3 months |
| seen | Feb 14 at 18:20 | |
| stats | profile views | 5 |
|
Jun 3 |
accepted | NIntegrate failling on floating value |
|
Jun 3 |
comment |
NIntegrate failling on floating value They were originally Q R with an implied multiplication, but a substitution of /. R->1 Turned them into Q 1. It's not supposed to be Q1 |
|
Jun 2 |
asked | NIntegrate failling on floating value |
|
Feb 24 |
asked | Definite and Indefinite integral give different results for piecewise function |
|
Feb 23 |
comment |
Are there any cases when For[] loops are reasonable? @Albert I agree that a comment would be the better options, but a belt and suspenders approach would argue that it makes sense to do both. Also, while a programmer can sit down and try and turn a For loop into parallel code, already has a built in ParallelTable, ParallelMap, and ParallelDo, but no ParallelFor. If a future programmer wants to parallelize the For loop, she's at least going to be forced to read the code first. |
|
Feb 22 |
awarded | Teacher |
|
Feb 22 |
answered | Are there any cases when For[] loops are reasonable? |
|
Feb 15 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Feb 15 |
accepted | Parallelizing Numerical Integration in Mathematica |
|
Feb 14 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Feb 13 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Feb 13 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Feb 13 |
revised |
Parallelizing Numerical Integration in Mathematica Added more information about the term being integrated. |
|
Feb 13 |
awarded | Student |
|
Feb 10 |
asked | Parallelizing Numerical Integration in Mathematica |