Reputation
289
Top tag
Next privilege 300 Rep.
Create new tags
Badges
1 8
Impact
~3k people reached

  • 0 posts edited
  • 0 helpful flags
  • 14 votes cast
Feb
23
awarded  Popular Question
Nov
19
comment Question about PrimeZetaP
For the close votes, I deleted a comment to the effect that the question hopefully would elicit a line or two about the implementation, which is why I asked here and not MSE. Since the answer does in fact contain a note about implementation, I think the question-answer make sense here.
Nov
19
accepted Question about PrimeZetaP
Nov
19
comment Question about PrimeZetaP
Will check the MSE answer. It's valid on (0,1] then I take it?
Nov
19
asked Question about PrimeZetaP
Sep
14
accepted WorkingPrecision in a sum
Sep
14
comment WorkingPrecision in a sum
With pleasure. I usually give it 24 hours but got occupied.
Sep
11
comment WorkingPrecision in a sum
This is very much what I was looking for, thanks.
Sep
10
comment WorkingPrecision in a sum
@MarcoB: Yes, I just used Plot[ f2, { } ] with limits. But I doubt I get the benefit of 50 terms if I don't increase precision. What's wrong with it? Nothing, but I would like to identify zeros of the sum with good precision. My experience with 9.0 (home) is that there is often a big diff. in results from precision unspecified to precision specified.
Sep
10
asked WorkingPrecision in a sum
Aug
27
comment Range of summation in simple Plot seems off
@belisarius: If I had access to a scanner I would have provided one. I understood why you asked for a scan. As it turns out the question was answered without it but I certainly don't disagree that would have been ideal.
Aug
27
comment Range of summation in simple Plot seems off
The typo was in my question (in the formula but not the code), not the book. Corrected now. Helpful answer and references and tip.
Aug
27
revised Range of summation in simple Plot seems off
added 4 characters in body
Aug
27
accepted Range of summation in simple Plot seems off
Aug
26
comment Range of summation in simple Plot seems off
@belisarius: Perhaps not. Thanks for the edits and check of the range. If I get access to a scanner I will add the graphs. Or if someone who has the book can confirm that my description of the range is correct--the graph is on p. 198, upper left (his $T_1$).
Aug
26
revised Range of summation in simple Plot seems off
edited body
Aug
26
asked Range of summation in simple Plot seems off
Jan
1
accepted Question about ReplacePart
Dec
31
comment Question about ReplacePart
With that in mind I will accept yours as the more general solution, although because my lists are almost always of numbers Kuba's response was helpful.
Dec
31
comment Question about ReplacePart
Kuba has not posted his/her answer--what do you think of that suggestion, out of curiosity?