meta user
network profile
| bio | website | 554256995.qzone.qq.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Changping, China | |
| age | 18 | |
| visits | member for | 7 months |
| seen | Mar 10 at 3:18 | |
| stats | profile views | 14 |
A happy sophomore~ [A 2B JUNIOR à l'automne] (Chinese meaning forbidden here 1o1z)
Green in C. Starter in C++, MFC, AS 3.0 and WT*. Learnt some calculus, introductory linear algebra, basic oo concepts and learning Al-Gore-ithms.
I really like SE, don't I???
|
Nov 24 |
awarded | Critic |
|
Nov 22 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Nov 22 |
accepted | Multi-Factorial and Series with Triple-factorial terms |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Multi-Factorial and Series with Triple-factorial terms This answers my original intent, and provided a way to verify that the two results are equivalent. |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Multi-Factorial and Series with Triple-factorial terms (+1) I like to explore, and I like your answer. I hope you won't mind that I "accept" @J.M. 's answer, as his directly answers my question. |
|
Nov 22 |
comment |
Multi-Factorial and Series with Triple-factorial terms I like the simplicity of this definition, but the sum still doesn't evaluate. |
|
Nov 21 |
comment |
Multi-Factorial and Series with Triple-factorial terms It worked. Output N[Hypergeometric2F1[1, 1, 4/3, -1]] which is $0.590718\cdots$, the same as the given result. Why the difference? Prod doesn't seem to be non-recursive? And I'm now trying to comprehending yours. |
|
Nov 21 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Nov 21 |
revised |
Multi-Factorial and Series with Triple-factorial terms Prod definition. |
|
Nov 21 |
comment |
Multi-Factorial and Series with Triple-factorial terms I did speculate about the special-functions tag, but wasn't sure about it. :) |
|
Nov 21 |
awarded | Student |
|
Nov 21 |
asked | Multi-Factorial and Series with Triple-factorial terms |
|
Oct 20 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Oct 20 |
awarded | Supporter |
