| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil | |
| age | 28 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 3 months |
| seen | Apr 19 at 14:48 | |
| stats | profile views | 71 |
I am currently a post-doc at the Physics department at the University of Sao Paulo. My interests are in Statistical Physics, stochastic processes and magnetism. More importantly, I really value simple and solid explanations to important problems in any science.
|
May 9 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Mar 13 |
comment |
Counting the number of a specific type of permutation This is precisely the type of Sort syntax that I was trying to figure out. Thanks for the help. |
|
Mar 13 |
comment |
Counting the number of a specific type of permutation This works great and also agrees with Carraher's answer. Thank you very much. Do you have any references in which I could learn more from these types of calculations. I think I will soon encounter more complicated combinations. Thank you very much for the help. |
|
Mar 13 |
accepted | Counting the number of a specific type of permutation |
|
Mar 13 |
asked | Counting the number of a specific type of permutation |
|
Mar 6 |
comment |
Why does compiling a function with ConstantArray give an error when used in parallel? Thank you all for the support and the useful feedback, and sorry about the 'bug' labelling. ConstantArray seemed like a simple function, and I have found other seemingly more complicated functions which compiled fine. |
|
Mar 6 |
accepted | Why does compiling a function with ConstantArray give an error when used in parallel? |
|
Mar 5 |
asked | Why does compiling a function with ConstantArray give an error when used in parallel? |
|
Feb 1 |
awarded | Yearling |
|
Jan 18 |
awarded | Good Question |
|
Jan 16 |
comment |
More efficient matrix-vector product @Jens Actually, I asked that question :) |
|
Jan 15 |
revised |
More efficient matrix-vector product Added that $A$ is symmetric |
|
Jan 15 |
comment |
More efficient matrix-vector product @rcollyer What exactly do you mean by generating in eigenspace: if $A = S \Lambda S^{-1}$ then I should do $Ax = S \Lambda S^{-1} x$? Also, I read your link on spherical components, but didn't really get how that would translate to the present problem. Again, thanks for the help. |
|
Jan 15 |
comment |
More efficient matrix-vector product Hi all. Sorry for the delay in answering. Yes, $A$ will usually have full rank. It is also symmetric and has zero diagonal. But I don't know all the $x$'s in advance, so I need one dot product at a time. Thank you all for the support. |
|
Jan 15 |
asked | More efficient matrix-vector product |
|
Jan 8 |
awarded | Popular Question |
|
Dec 8 |
comment |
Converting other C++ classes to MTensor in LibraryLink @halirutan Oh yeah! Very much :) |
|
Sep 12 |
awarded | Caucus |
|
Aug 25 |
accepted | Computing polynomial eigenvalues in Mathematica |
|
Aug 25 |
comment |
Computing polynomial eigenvalues in Mathematica @J.M. Amazing answer. Thank you a lot. |