| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Germany | |
| age | 67 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 3 months |
| seen | Feb 18 at 8:37 | |
| stats | profile views | 123 |
I'm a retired college math teacher. I use Mathematica since version 2.2 and begun TeX with emTeX about 1990. Other languages I use are C, Perl, bash ...
|
May 9 |
answered | About the number format in ticks |
|
May 8 |
comment |
Solving complex equations I think WRI has thougt about the Assumptions option of PowerExoand. I wrote the default were True, but it is Automatic. Look what Power[(a b)^n,Assumptions->#]&/@{Automatic,True} does. $Assumptions defaults to True, so Assumptions->$Assumptions is not appropriate for PowerExpand |
|
May 8 |
answered | Solving complex equations |
|
May 8 |
comment |
Solving complex equations Not all functions with Assumtion Option do have the default Assumptions->$Assumptions. AFAIK the only one which doesn't is PowerExpand with default Assumptions->True. So Assuming works only for Functions having the default option Assumptions->$Assumptions. |
|
May 8 |
awarded | Nice Answer |
|
May 7 |
revised |
Rationalize the Denominator by Default corrected a typo in input. |
|
May 7 |
comment |
Rationalize the Denominator by Default @rmv sorry I missed to copy this definition. I've added it to my answer. |
|
May 7 |
revised |
Rationalize the Denominator by Default Added definition of EvaluiereAt |
|
May 7 |
revised |
Rationalize the Denominator by Default inserted a line break |
|
May 7 |
answered | Rationalize the Denominator by Default |
|
May 7 |
awarded | Fanatic |
|
May 7 |
answered | Attaching persistent assumptions to symbol definition |
|
May 6 |
answered | Conditional expression |
|
May 1 |
revised |
Is it possible to have Mathematica move all terms to one side of an equation? changed comment to edit |
|
May 1 |
answered | Is it possible to have Mathematica move all terms to one side of an equation? |
|
Apr 27 |
comment |
How can I style text like in the documentation? Are you looking for the tutorial/EnteringTwoDimensionalInput in the Mathematica Documentation? |
|
Apr 25 |
awarded | Self-Learner |
|
Apr 25 |
comment |
How to format numbers with at least one figure after the decimal point @murray Yes, but for 0 and 1 I find giving an Integer is fine. In german numbers are never written in the form "27." or ".27" etc, the dot (we use a comma) has alway to be between to digits. |
|
Apr 25 |
answered | How to format numbers with at least one figure after the decimal point |
|
Apr 25 |
accepted | How to format numbers with at least one figure after the decimal point |