| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 9 months |
| seen | Dec 20 '12 at 15:34 | |
| stats | profile views | 41 |
|
Apr 29 |
awarded | Self-Learner |
|
Feb 18 |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
Dec 20 |
comment |
_?NumericQ equivalent for lists Do you mean like this? MyFunction[arg_?(VectorQ[#,NumericQ]&)] |
|
Dec 20 |
asked | _?NumericQ equivalent for lists |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
Is there a way to continuously update only *some* variables in Manipulate? In summary, I move a slider which changes the position of a Locator on a ListLinePlot. No problem there - that's fast. But the slider also sends a command to an external app. This is too slow to evaluate at every slider step, so I only want to send the command once the slider is released. |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
Is there a way to continuously update only *some* variables in Manipulate? Oops, no it doesn't, no live update of the slider graphic itself. This one works: Slider[Dynamic[ x, {None, Automatic, Function[{v, e}, Print@slow[v], HoldRest]}]] |
|
Dec 12 |
revised |
Is there a way to continuously update only *some* variables in Manipulate? added 214 characters in body |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
Is there a way to continuously update only *some* variables in Manipulate? Thanks - yes, that's an accurate description of the problem. This also works: Slider[Dynamic[ x, {None, Function[{v, e}, Print@fast[v], HoldRest], Function[{v, e}, Print@slow[v], HoldRest]}]] |
|
Dec 12 |
revised |
Is there a way to continuously update only *some* variables in Manipulate? added 13 characters in body |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
Is there a way to continuously update only *some* variables in Manipulate? ...ah...however...apologies, perhaps I didn't explain the problem. I have only one slider - but two things respond to the value of the slider - I want to make only one of those thing react in real-time, whilst the other waits for the slider to be released. |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
Is there a way to continuously update only *some* variables in Manipulate? Thanks - another simple thing I didn't know! |
|
Dec 12 |
asked | Is there a way to continuously update only *some* variables in Manipulate? |
|
Dec 9 |
answered | What is ImageDistance measuring? |
|
Dec 3 |
accepted | Dialog inside Dynamic Module |
|
Dec 3 |
comment |
Dialog inside Dynamic Module Thanks - sorry for the duplicate. |
|
Dec 3 |
asked | Dialog inside Dynamic Module |
|
Dec 1 |
comment |
Button's command is not evaluated in iteration Many thanks, that's a great link too. |
|
Dec 1 |
asked | Button's command is not evaluated in iteration |
|
Nov 20 |
comment |
Time approximation of decrypting RSA algorithm Sorry, for some reason when I answered earlier the graph wasn't showing on my device ( iPad ). Now I can see it. Regardless, you have a huge problem trying to extrapolate so far out. As @wxffles asked, are you confident in the model? But even if the model is perfect, a visual inspection of the graph and data points suggests that the uncertainty in your extrapolation from these data points is bound to be absolutely enormous. |
|
Nov 20 |
comment |
Time approximation of decrypting RSA algorithm Did you post your data points correctly? As @ssch pointed out, the second one at least looks wrong, and the others show a rather odd pattern. I find it unsuprising that a fit to those values gives a result you weren't expecting. Are you getting these results from experimental factorizations? ( I guess that's what you're doing). If so, I think you need a lot more sample runs at each bit length. |