Reputation
10,545
Next privilege 15,000 Rep.
Protect questions
Badges
2 24 99
Impact
~122k people reached

Apr
23
comment Multiply integrand with -1, and the precision changes?
@Searke Thanks for the response. (1) With "SymbolicProcessing->0" the problem remains: pmhankelTest[p_, sign_: 1, prec_: 16] := NIntegrate[sign ξ BesselJ[0, ξ] f[p, ξ], {ξ, 0, ∞}, WorkingPrecision -> prec, Method -> {"ExtrapolatingOscillatory", "SymbolicProcessing" -> 0}];pmhankelTest[32, #, 32] & /@ {-1, 1} (2) I tried IntegrationMonitor mentioned in this answer, the {"Boundaries", "Dimension", "Error", "GetRule", "Integrand"} etc. seems to be all the same, and the only difference between "Integral" is the sign.
Apr
23
revised Multiply integrand with -1, and the precision changes?
added 82 characters in body
Apr
22
revised Multiply integrand with -1, and the precision changes?
deleted 12 characters in body
Apr
22
revised Multiply integrand with -1, and the precision changes?
edited tags
Apr
22
revised Multiply integrand with -1, and the precision changes?
added 22 characters in body
Apr
22
revised Numerical inverse Laplace-Hankel transform
Correct mistakes caused by a typo in the paper.
Apr
22
asked Multiply integrand with -1, and the precision changes?
Apr
22
revised Numerical inverse Laplace-Hankel transform
Typo fixed.
Apr
21
asked Numerical inverse Laplace-Hankel transform
Apr
18
revised DSolve breaks when the ordering of independent variables aren't proper?
deleted 2 characters in body
Apr
17
revised DSolve breaks when the ordering of independent variables aren't proper?
added 8 characters in body; edited tags
Apr
16
comment Compute inverse Laplace transform with Integrate
Though not a complete answer, thanks for your effort :)
Apr
15
awarded  Nice Question
Apr
15
comment Why can't I change the value of MaxRecursion in NIntegrate when integrating BesselJ?
@ShutaoTANG Mainly because I'm still in v9 and want to make the post self-contained so not that willing to use LetL etc. in this sample. You can have a look at this post: mathematica.stackexchange.com/a/54874/1871
Apr
14
revised Why can't I change the value of MaxRecursion in NIntegrate when integrating BesselJ?
deleted 38 characters in body
Apr
14
comment Why can't I change the value of MaxRecursion in NIntegrate when integrating BesselJ?
@J.M. I did hesitate for a while but finally decided to post this answer. Anyway this integral contains BesselJ and if you tried something like uztran[specialp, WorkingPrecision -> 64, MinRecursion -> 20, MaxRecursion -> 40] you'll see the same warning as that mentioned in the question.
Apr
14
revised Why can't I change the value of MaxRecursion in NIntegrate when integrating BesselJ?
deleted 2 characters in body
Apr
14
answered Why can't I change the value of MaxRecursion in NIntegrate when integrating BesselJ?
Apr
14
awarded  Announcer
Apr
14
reviewed Close Export a plot to Excel