meta user
network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | ||
| age | ||
| visits | member for | 1 year, 4 months |
| seen | 4 mins ago | |
| stats | profile views | 1,304 |
|
4h |
revised |
ListContourPlot is blocking my geometry Made the data available and fixed the code so it is c'n'p-able |
|
4h |
revised |
ListContourPlot is blocking my geometry added 1786 characters in body |
|
6h |
comment |
Options which require RuleDelayed @OleksandrR. Yes, I'm fully aware that basically this discussion is useless, because in most places I can use either -> or :> and in the end it's always the users decision. But making option completion insert the rule makes you type really fast and should the usual choice not fit, you can always go back and change it. |
|
9h |
awarded | Good Question |
|
11h |
awarded | Nice Question |
|
13h |
comment |
Options which require RuleDelayed +1 This is what I tried first, although I just used fgrep and searched only in the ReferencePages sub-folder. Like you I wasn't able to figure out a good criterion for selecting the relevant ones. |
|
14h |
revised |
ListContourPlot is blocking my geometry added 148 characters in body |
|
14h |
answered | ListContourPlot is blocking my geometry |
|
17h |
comment |
Options which require RuleDelayed @SjoerdC.deVries Yes, I should have thought about this too since I used it quite often lately. |
|
17h |
comment |
Options which require RuleDelayed @J.M. You can always trick Mathematica like here NMinimize[x^4 - 3 x^2 - x, x, EvaluationMonitor -> Hold[Print[x]]] but I think especially in the monitor options the user almost always wants :>. In many other cases it probably doesn't hurt to use :> in preference to ->. |
|
17h |
revised |
Options which require RuleDelayed added 223 characters in body |
|
18h |
revised |
Options which require RuleDelayed added 578 characters in body |
|
18h |
answered | Options which require RuleDelayed |
|
20h |
asked | Options which require RuleDelayed |
|
20h |
revised |
Abridging Lists of Equations within NDSolve, Manipulate added 74 characters in body |
|
23h |
comment |
Doing vector manipulations in Mathematica (Part 2) @user6818 Your question should be self-contained. This one refers to a former question and the former question of yourse again refers to an even earlier question.. You should make your question clear in explaining what you want to achieve here without having everyone reading several other questions. Even then this question is highly specific and probably too localized to fit in here. |
|
23h |
comment |
Doing vector manipulations in Mathematica (Part 2) @JonathanShock There is nothing strange about this. You replace k2->{1,2} and at the moment you are doing this, you get {1+q,2+q} inside Norm which is a vector and therefore it gets simplified to the (scalar) norm-value Sqrt[Abs[1+q]^2+Abs[2+q]^2]. If you replace now q again by a vector, you get a new vector. |
|
May 15 |
comment |
Solve √(2x-5) - √(x-1) = 1 Welcome here. I'm not entirely sure whether you are on the right place. This is the site for the software Mathematica and not a mathmatics site. |
|
May 14 |
comment |
How to plot filling under a curve? You have to use PlotRange->All inside your second plot, not in the Show. |
|
May 14 |
comment |
How to plot filling under a curve? @Misery I was referring to other users finding this question and hoping for an explanation of the behavior. Assume a slightly more difficult problem and having a more complex solution without any explanation. |
